Cited by 52Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyMorphological variations and asymmetry

Comparative functional morphology of the masticatory apparatus in the long-snouted crocodiles.

Endo, H., Aoki, R., Taru, H., Kimura, J., Sasaki, M., Yamamoto, M., Arishima, K., Hayashi, Y.·2002·Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia

Abstract

The masticatory muscles and their related structures of the skull were observed in the Indian gavial (Gavialis gangeticus), the false gavial (Tomistoma schlegelii), and the African slender-snouted crocodile (Mecistops cataphractus) to detail some morphological differences in comparison with the other crocodile species, and to compare and elucidate the functional strategy of themasticatory apparatus in these long-snouted species. The Musculus pterygoideus posterior was relatively smaller in the three species compared with many short-snouted crocodiles. It suggests that the masticatory power in fish-eating long-snouted species is not so high as in the short-snouted crocodiles, while the masticatory muscles were morphologically different among the three long-snouted species as follows. The M. pterygoideus posterior of the false gavial was extended in the lateral side of the lower jaw unlike the Indian gavial. The M. pseudotemporalis and the Fenestra supratemporalis were largely developed in the Indian gavial, however we suggest that the other two species possess the weak bundles in this muscle. The false gavial and the African slender-snouted crocodile have the pterygoid bone well-developed extending dorso-ventrally and it is suggested that the M. adductor mandibulae posterior attached to the pterygoid bone may be much larger than the Indian gavial. These data morphologically clarify the masticatory mechanism in the long-snouted crocodiles different from the short-snouted specie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1439-0264.2002.00396.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gavialis gangeticus independently evolved extremely hypertrophied, low-mechanical advantage adductor mandibulae muscles, and small, fusiform-fibered posterior pterygoid muscles that presumably accentuate rapid jaw closure.

    “These low-force biters independently evolved extremely hypertrophied, low-mechanical advantage adductor mandibulae muscles, and small, fusiform-fibered posterior pterygoid muscles that presumably accentuate rapid jaw closure [17], [19].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Endo, H., Aoki, R., Taru, H., Kimura, J., Sasaki, M., Yamamoto, M., Arishima, K., & Hayashi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History (JP)
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JP)
  • Azabu University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Endo, H.
Venue
Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-29
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
206-213
ISSN
  • 0300-8649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-2096
  • 1439-0264
OpenAlex
W2151267567
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomia Histologia Embryologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
stomatognathic system, Gavialis gangeticus, Tomistoma schlegelii, Mecistops cataphractus, masticatory muscles, pterygoid bone, skull morphology, functional morphology
MeSH terms
Alligators and Crocodiles, Animals, Cephalometry, Mandible, Masticatory Muscles, Skull, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review