The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks
Abstract
We studied variation in the loud barks of free‐ranging female chacma baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) with respect to context, predator type, and individuality over an 18‐month period in the Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana. To examine acoustic differences in relation to these variables, we extracted a suite of acoustic parameters from digitized calls and applied discriminant function analyses. The barks constitute a graded continuum, ranging from a tonal, harmonically rich call into a call with a more noisy, harsh structure. Tonal barks are typically given when the signaler is at risk of losing contact with the group or when a mother and infant have become separated (contact barks). The harsher variants are given in response to large predators (alarm barks). However, there are also intermediate forms between the two subtypes which may occur in both situations. This finding is not due to an overlap of individuals' distinct distributions but can be replicated within individuals. Within the alarm bark category, there are significant differences between calls given in response to mammalian carnivores and those given in response to crocodiles. Again, there are intermediate variants. Both alarm call types are equally different from contact barks, indicating that the calls vary along different dimensions. Finally, there are consistent, significant differences among different individuals' calls. However, individual identity in one call type cannot directly be inferred from knowledge of the individuals' call characteristics in the other. In sum, the barks of female baboons potentially provide rich information to the recipients of these signals. The extent to which baboons discriminate between alarm and contact barks, and classify calls according to context and/or acoustic similarity will be described in a subsequent paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218526.001.0001 · Cited by 2,268 · cited 4×
“Along with expressing emotion, the baboons' alarm and contact barks may also be viewed as re¯ecting the caller's mental representation of speci®c events in the external world (Cheney & Seyfarth 1990).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationKlump, G. M., & Shalter, M. D. (1984) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb01365.x · Cited by 378
Cited by
Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence
Briefer, E. F. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x · Cited by 541
The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research
Taylor, A. M., & Reby, D. (2010) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x · Cited by 407
Factors Affecting Reproduction and Mortality Among Baboons in the Okavango Delta, Botswana
Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Fischer, J., Beehner, J., Bergman, T., Johnson, S. E., Kitchen, D. M., Palombit, R. A., Rendall, D., & Silk, J. B. (2004) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1023/b:ijop.0000019159.75573.13 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, J., Hammerschmidt, K., Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M.
- Venue
- Ethology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-54
- ISSN
- 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0310
- OpenAlex
- W2153686202
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00630.x
- The paper
- Fischer, J., Hammerschmidt, K., Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2001). Acoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.