The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Resource Allocation on Behavioural Strategies: A Comparison of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and Two Domesticated Breeds of Poultry
Abstract
Three different breeds of poultry, representing different degrees of domestication, were observed in semi‐natural conditions in order to study differences in foraging behaviour, activity levels and social behaviours which could be caused by correlated responses to selection for increased production. The breeds used were: (i) red junglefowl (Gallus gallus); (ii) Swedish bantam, which is a domestic breed that has not undergone selection for production traits; and (iii) Hy‐Line, a White leghorn laying hybrid, selected mainly for food conversion efficiency. The birds were offered ad libitum food simultaneously from sites where the food was freely available and from sites where the birds had to search and scratch for food which was mixed with wood‐shavings. The behaviour was observed three times per day (48 min/d), 3 d per week in eight groups (four birds per group) of each breed between 7 and 18 wks of age. Junglefowl and bantam obtained a significantly higher proportion of their food from the site that required effort. The opposite case was true for the Hy‐Line. Overall, bantams performed significantly more foraging behaviour than Hy‐Lines. The Hy‐Line breed was more inactive and less involved in social interactions than the junglefowl and the bantam. The results support the idea that selection for high production results in modified behavioural strategies. Behaviours that are of high energetic cost, such as extensive foraging and social interactions, were of lower in frequency in the laying hens compared to junglefowl and bantam, allowing the laying hens to save energy that can be reallocated to production traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl
Pizzari, T., Cornwallis, C. K., Løvlie, H., Jakobsson, S., & Birkhead, T. R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02004 · Cited by 301
Animal domestication and behavior
(2002) · doi:10.1079/9780851995977.0000 · Cited by 288
Feather damaging behaviour in parrots: A review with consideration of comparative aspects
van Zeeland, Y. R. A., Spruit, B. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Riedstra, B., van Hierden, Y. M., Buitenhuis, B., Korte, S. M., & Lumeij, J. T. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.006 · Cited by 139
Domestication effects on behavioural and hormonal responses to acute stress in chickens
Ericsson, M., Fallahsharoudi, A., Bergquist, J., Kushnir, M. M., & Jensen, P. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.024 · Cited by 93
Self-citationAgnvall, B., Bélteky, J., & Jensen, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03236-4 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schütz, K. E., & Jensen, P.
- Venue
- Ethology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 753-765
- ISSN
- 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0310
- OpenAlex
- W2115679574
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Resource Allocation on Behavioural Strategies: A Comparison of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and Two Domesticated Breeds of Poultry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x
- The paper
- Schütz, K. E., & Jensen, P. (2001). Effects of Resource Allocation on Behavioural Strategies: A Comparison of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and Two Domesticated Breeds of Poultry. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.