Do Glow‐Worm Larvae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) Use Warning Coloration?
Abstract
It is generally believed that the glowing behaviour of lampyrid larvae may be an aposematic display. Moreover, larvae of the common glow‐worm (Lampyris noctiluca) show at least two other features, which can be used in aposematic strategies. The first is their suggestive colour pattern of yellow‐pinkish lateral dots on a jet‐black background and the second a possible warning odour. We performed experiments with starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to test, in particular, for the significance of the colour pattern as a warning signal. Learning experiments showed that glow‐worm larvae were distasteful and that starlings showed increasing avoidance of the distasteful prey through a learning process. Experiments with mimics and glow‐worm larvae with obscured colours showed that starlings recognized glow‐worm larvae by their colour pattern. However, there was an important effect of experience as one group of starlings that had previous contact with edible glow‐worm mimics, showed delayed avoidance learning and was able to discriminate mimics from glow‐worms thereafter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Defensive coloration and luminescence represent ancestral aposematic traits of other paedomorphic elateroid lineages such as Lampyridae and Phengodidae.
“Interestingly, defensive coloration (Linsley et al. , 1961) and luminescence (De Cock & Matthysen, 2001) represent ancestral aposematic traits of other paedomorphic elateroid lineages such as Lampyridae and Phengodidae (Bocak et al. , 2008).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as De Cock & Matthysen, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- De Cock, R., & Matthysen, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- ORCID
- Matthysen, Erik
- Venue
- Ethology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11-26
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1019-1033
- ISSN
- 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0310
- OpenAlex
- W1975627432
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Keywords
- Lampyris noctiluca, aposematism, avoidance learning, mimicry, predator learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review