The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of cellulose on the digestibility of high starch versus high fat diets in dogs
Abstract
The effects of cellulose added in three levels (7, 15 and 20% crude fibre in dry matter) to three different basal diets (a high fat diet, a high starch diet with raw starch and a high starch diet with cooked starch) on apparent digestibility were investigated in eight adult dogs. Cellulose had little effect on the apparent digestibility of fat. In the high fat diet there was no significant decrease, not even at the highest cellulose level (98.3% compared with 98.1% in the basal high fat diet). In the cooked starch diets, fat digestibility decreased from 95.1% in the basal cooked starch diet to 93.8% at the highest cellulose level. In the raw starch diets, digestibility did not decrease with increasing cellulose levels. The apparent digestibility of crude protein was considerably decreased by cellulose in all diets. Starch also decreased protein digestibility and the effects of cellulose and starch appeared to be additive (high fat diet decrease of protein digestibility from 86.7 to 83.5%, cooked starch from 81.6 to 78.6%, raw starch from 79.0 to 70.8%, basal diets to highest cellulose levels, respectively). The apparent digestibility of nitrogen‐free extract decreased from 93.9% in the basal cooked starch diet to 84.5% at the highest cellulose level. The figures for the raw starch diets were similar (decrease from 93.4 to 85.9%). Cellulose decreased the apparent digestibility of energy in all diets. This decrease was more marked in the high starch diets (cooked starch decrease from 89.1 to 69.6%, raw starch from 88.9 to 70.2%) than in the high fat diet (decrease from 90.1 to 76.1%). An evaluation of previous data showed that in general fibre has a higher impact on the apparent digestibility of energy in high carbohydrate diets than in low carbohydrate diets. The apparent digestibility of potassium, sodium and chloride was impaired by cellulose. The apparent digestibility of these minerals tended to be lower in the high starch diets, especially in the raw starch diet, and the effect of cellulose was usually more marked in those diets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, predictive equations have been designed to take into account the fiber portion of the food [12]–[14], or the amino acid and non-amino acid compounds in the crude protein fraction to better predict ME [11], [15].”
From Using Gross Energy Improves Metabolizable Energy Predictive Equations for Pet Foods Whereas Undigested Protein and Fiber Content Predict Stool Quality (2013) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bergner H. 1986:Übers. Tierernährg.14 101–101. · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(86)90039-5
- Diez M. Hornick J. L. Baldwin P. Van EEnaeme C. Istasse L. Van EEnaeme C. 1998:Res. Vet Sci.64 91–91. · doi:10.1016/s0034-5288(98)90001-7
- Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Corbin J. E. Hamilton A. K. Bauer L. L. Titgemeyer E. C. Hirakawa D. A. 1992:J. Anim. Sci.70 1169–1169. · doi:10.2527/1992.7041169x
- Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Corbin J. E. Hamilton A. K. Serbe K. A. Hirakawa D. A. 1990b:J. Anim. Sci.68 4229–4229. · doi:10.2527/1990.68124229x
- Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Corbin J. E. Hamilton A. K. Serbe K. A. Lewis S. M. Hirakawa D. A. 1990a:J. Anim. Sci.68 4221–4221. · DOI
- Gröner T.&Pfeffer E. 1997a:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.77 207–207. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00756.x
- Gröner T.&Pfeffer E. 1997b:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.77 214–214. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00757.x
- Kienzle E. 1988:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.60 276–276. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1988.tb00203.x
- Kienzle E. 1993:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.69 102–102. · doi:10.1017/s0308229600024284
- Kienzle E. 1994:J. Nutr.124 2568S–2568S. · doi:10.1093/jn/124.suppl_12.2568s
- Kienzle E. Opitz B. Earle K. E. Smith P. M. Maskell I. E. 1998a:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.79 46–46. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1998.tb00628.x
- Kienzle E. Opitz B. Earle K. E. Smith P. M. Maskell I. E. Iben C. 1998b:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.79 69–69. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1998.tb00630.x
- Lewis L. D. Magerkurth J. H. Roudebush P. Morris M. L. JR Mitchell E. E. Teeter S. M. 1994:J. Nutr.124 2716S–2716S. · DOI · Paper page
- Meyer H. Mundt H. C. Thomee A. 1980:Kleintierpraxis25 267–267. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-060309-1.50012-4
- Morris J. Trudell J. Pencovic T. 1977:Br. J. Nutr.37 365–365. · DOI
- Osterberg‐GEbauer R. 1972:J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr.30 101–101. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1972.tb00172.x
- Petry H.&Rapp W. 1970:Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernährung Futtermittelk.27 181–181. · doi:10.1007/bf00674500
- Sauer C.&Ozimek K. L. 1986:Livestock Prod. Sci.15 367–367. · DOI · Paper page
- Slavin W. 1968:Chem. Anal.25 87–87. · doi:10.1017/s0003161500012281
- Sunvold G. D. Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Bourquin L. D. Titgemeyer E. C. Bauer L. L. Reinhart G. A. 1995c:J. Anim. Sci.73 2329–2329. · doi:10.2527/1995.7382329x
- Sunvold G. D. Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Reinhart G. A. 1995b:J. Anim. Sci.73 1110–1110. · DOI
- Sunvold G. D. Fahey G. C. JR Merchen N. R. Titgemeyer E. C. Bourquin L. D. Bauer L. L. Reinhart G. A. 1995a:J. Anim. Sci.73 1099–1099. · DOI · Paper page
- De WIlde R. O.&Jansen T. 1990:Nutrition of the dog and cat. In: BURGER I. H.; RIVERS J. P. W. (eds) Waltham Symposium Number 7 pp. 259–266. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Cited by
Hall, J. A., Melendez, L. D., & Jewell, D. E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054405 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Kienzle, E., Dobenecker, B., & Eber, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 174-185
- ISSN
- 0931-2439
- 1439-0396
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of cellulose on the digestibility of high starch versus high fat diets in dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2001.00315.x
- The paper
- Kienzle, E., Dobenecker, B., & Eber, S. (2001). Effect of cellulose on the digestibility of high starch versus high fat diets in dogs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2001.00315.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
