Epidemiology, treatment and outcome of candidemia: a five‐year review at three Canadian hospitals: Epidemiologie, Behandlung und ausgang von Candidämien: Eine Fünfjahresübersicht an drei kanadischen Hospitälern
Abstract
To determine treatment regimens and epidemiological patterns in the occurrence of candidemia, a review of cases occurring from 1992 to 1996 in three large Canadian hospitals, University of Alberta Hospital (UAH) and Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH), Edmonton, and Foothills Medical Center (FMC), Calgary, was carried out. Cases were detected by reviewing microbiology laboratory records. There were 202 cases in all (UAH 104, FMC 70, RAH 28). For the five study years the candidemia rate was 4.5/10 000 discharges (UAH 7.6, FMC 4.9, and RAH 1.7; P < 0.05 for all interhospital comparisons). The rate remained stable between 1992 and 1995 but rose dramatically in 1996 to 7.6/10 000 (P < 0.01 compared to 1995) as a result of increases at UAH and RAH. Of the 208 species identified, Candida albicans accounted for 135 (65%). During hospitalization 93 (46%) patients died. Species did not influence outcome. Antifungal treatment with fluconazole alone was given to 14% of patients, and increased in frequency throughout the study. No antifungal therapy was given to 47 patients (23%). This group had a much higher mortality (68%) than those who received treatment (39% P < 0.01). Twenty of the untreated patients had already died by the time the blood culture had been reported as growing a yeast. Candidemia rates vary significantly between hospitals and increased in some but not all over the five study years. As many patients with candidemia will have died by the time laboratory diagnosis is made, presumptive antifungal therapy in high-risk patients may be necessary if outcome is to be improved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-albicans species of Candida are increasingly associated with invasive candidiasis.
“Although Candida albicans remains the most common pathogen in oropharyngeal and cutaneous candidiasis, non-albicans species of Candida are increasingly associated with invasive candidiasis [1][2][3][4][5].”
From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Macphail, G. L. P., Taylor, G. D., Buchanan‐Chell, M., Ross, C., Wilson, S., & Kureishi, A.
- Affiliations
- Foothills Medical Centre (CA)
- University of Alberta Hospital (CA)
- Royal Alexandra Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, G. D.
- ORCID
- Macphail, G. L. P.
- Venue
- Mycoses
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 141-145
- ISSN
- 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
- 0933-7407
- 1439-0507
- OpenAlex
- W1753843915
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mycoses (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- candidemia, Candida albicans, antifungal therapy, fluconazole, mortality, epidemiology, hospital-acquired fungal infection, treatment outcomes, Candida species distribution
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Antifungal Agents, Canada, Candida, Candidiasis, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over, Hospitals, University, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Risk Factors, Fungemia, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review