Cited by 149Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience of respiration and sleepNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Relative Timing Of Inspiration And Expiration Affects Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia

Strauss‐Blasche, G, Moser, M, Voica, M, McLeod, Dr, Klammer, N, Marktl, W·2000·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

1. The effect of a variation in inspiration and expiration times on heart rate variability was studied in 12 healthy subjects (mean age 30+/-6 years; five females). 2. Two 2 min trials of controlled breathing, with either short inspiration followed by long expiration or long inspiration followed by short expiration, were compared. Average expiration/inspiration time ratios were 1.0 and 3.4, respectively. The respiration rate in both trials was approximately 10 cycles/min. 3. In trials with short inspiration followed by long expiration, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; as measured by mean absolute differences and by the high frequency band) was significantly larger than in trials with long inspiration followed by short expiration. This effect could not be accounted for by differences in respiration rate or respiratory amplitude. The higher RSA during fast/slow respiration is primarily due to a more pronounced phasic heart rate increase during inspiration, indicating that inspiratory vagal blockade is sensitive to the steepness of inspiration. 4. Respiration rate and tidal volume are respiratory variables known to modulate RSA. The results of the present study indicate that RSA can also be modulated by a third respiratory variable, the expiratory/inspiratory time ratio.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03306.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 5 min of DSB efficiently increases parasympathetic activity, as assessed by HF power, and decreases perceived anxiety level among young adults.

    “Accordingly, 5 min of DSB efficiently increases parasympathetic activity, as assessed by HF power (i.e., % of HF in the total HRV power) and decreased perceived anxiety level among young adults33–35.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 149

Authors
Strauss‐Blasche, G., Moser, M., Voica, M., McLeod, D., Klammer, N., & Marktl, W.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-08-14
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
601-606
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W2029568670
Cited by
149
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
respiratory sinus arrhythmia, heart rate variability, breath control, vagal blockade, respiration rate, tidal volume
MeSH terms
Adult, Arrhythmia, Sinus, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Vagus Nerve, Respiratory Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review