Cited by 30Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological diseases and metabolismNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Distribution and dynamic process of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusion (NCI) in MSA: Correlation of the density of NCI and the degree of involvement of the pontine nuclei

Open access
Yokoyama, Teruo, Kusunoki, Jun‐ichi, Hasegawa, Kazuko, Sakai, Haruhiko, Yagishita, Saburo·2001·Neuropathology

Abstract

MSA is a sporadic degenerative disease that occurs in striatonigral degeneration (SND), SDS and most cases of sporadic OPCA. Oligodendroglial inclusion is a hallmark of MSA. Recently there have been a small number of reports of neuronal argyrophilic inclusions. To clarify the distribution and dynamic process of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCI), 31 cases of MSA were studied using histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. The inclusions were exclusively found in the pontine nucleus and there was a correlation between the incidence of NCI and the severity of OPCA, but not of SND. NCI were increased to some extent in the cases with moderate OPCA and decreased in number in proportion to devastation of the pontine nuclei. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of NCI were virtually identical to those of glial cytoplasmic inclusions (GCI), which gives some clues to the pathogenesis of MSA. It is tempting to interpret this as NCI playing a significant role in the degenerative changes of the neurons at least in the pons. Further systematic studies on NCI in the other brain regions are necessary to elucidate the pathogenesis of neuronal degeneration in MSA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2001.00390.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pathological hallmark of MSA is abnormal accumulation of α-syn in the cytoplasm of oligodendrocytes, named glial cytoplasmic inclusions (GCIs).

    “The pathological hallmark of MSA is the abnormal accumulation of α-syn in the cytoplasm of oligodendrocytes, named glial cytoplasmic inclusions (GCIs).271–275”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 30

Authors
Yokoyama, T., Kusunoki, J., Hasegawa, K., Sakai, H., & Yagishita, S.
Affiliations
Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Yokoyama, Teruo
Venue
Neuropathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
145-154
ISSN
  • 0919-6544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1789
OpenAlex
W2040812849
Cited by
30
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
multiple system atrophy, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, pontine nuclei, striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy, glial cytoplasmic inclusions, neurodegeneration, pathogenesis, inclusion density
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Inclusion Bodies, Cytoplasm, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurofibrils, Neurons, Pons, Organelles, Neurites, tau Proteins, Neurofilament Proteins, Age of Onset, Multiple System Atrophy, Ubiquitin, Synucleins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review