The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Role of coping strategies and attitudes in mediating distress due to hallucinations in schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of coping strategies and attitudes in predicting distress due to hallucinations in schizophrenia. Seventy‐five chronic stable schizophrenia patients were assessed with respect to sociodemographic profile, clinical variables, general psychopathology, phenomenology (severity) of hallucinations, attitude towards hallucinations, distress due to hallucinations (determined by two measures) and coping strategies used to deal with hallucinations. On multiple stepwise regression analysis, ‘severity of hallucinations’ and ‘problem‐solving coping strategies’ contributed significantly to both measures of distress. It can be concluded that distress due to hallucinations in schizophrenia is determined by severity of hallucinations (stressor) and problem‐solving coping strategies. Attitudes do not seem to play any role in this respect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who are more distressed by auditory verbal hallucinations tend to use more avoidant or resistance coping strategies.
“In comparison, individuals who are more distressed by AVHs tend to use more avoidant or resistance coping strategies (Farhall et al., 2007;Singh et al., 2003;Vaughan & Fowler, 2004).”
From Mindfulness for voices: An experimental analogue study of the effect of manipulating response style to simulated voices in a non‐clinical population. (2023) · cites this paper as Singh et al., 2003
The Results and Discussion report that patients with greater distress used more coping strategies overall, particularly problem-solving strategies. The Results do not report a significant association between distress and avoidance coping, and do not identify resistance as a coping category. The cited paper therefore supports the broader distress–coping relationship, but not the specific strategy types claimed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1037/0021-843X.86.2.103 · DOI
- Hatfield BA, 1989, Patient's account of stress and coping in schizophrenics, Hosp. Comm. Psychiatry, 10, 1141
- Weidi KH, 1992, Assessment of coping with schizophrenia: Stressor, appraisal and coping behaviour, Br. J. Psychiatry, 161, 114, 10.1192/S0007125000297134 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005053-199603000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700052144 · DOI
- Kumar S, 1994, Coping with symptoms of schizophrenia: A cross‐cultural comparison, Indian J. Soc. Psychiatry, 10, 4
- Ramanathan A, 1984, A study of coping with auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics, Indian J. Psychiatry, 26, 229
- Ramanathan A, 1986, An exploratory study of the relation between neuroticism and certain aspects of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia, Indian J. Psychiatry, 28, 69
- 10.1097/00005053-199711000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01411.x · DOI
- 10.3109/09638239408997946 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.161.1.99 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.123.6.621 · DOI
- Bick PA, 1987, Auditory hallucinations and sub vocal speech in schizophrenic patients, Am. J. Psychiatry, 144, 221
- Chadwick P, 1994, The omnipotence of voices. Cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations, Br. J. Psychiatry, 164, 190, 10.1192/bjp.164.2.190 · DOI
- 10.1176/ajp.150.4.584 · DOI
- 10.1177/000306515800600304 · DOI
- 10.1093/schbul/15.2.209 · DOI · Paper page
- Overall JE, 1962, The brief psychiatric rating scale, Psychol. Rep., 102, 799, 10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00385666 · DOI
- Verma SK, 1978, Construction and standardization of PGI Health Questionnaire N2
- 10.2307/2136319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09515078808254201 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700046729 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, G., Sharan, P., & Kulhara, P.
- Affiliations
- Government Medical College and Hospital (IN)
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Gagandeep
- ORCID
- Sharan, Pratap
- Venue
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-28
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 517-522
- ISSN
- 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1819
- OpenAlex
- W2083212718
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, hallucinations, distress, coping strategies, problem-solving coping, hallucination severity, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Negotiating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
