Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,270

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults: study on optimal cut‐off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults

Bei‐Fan, Zhou, the Cooperative Meta‐analysis Group of Working Group on Obesity in China·2002·Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

For prevention of obesity in the Chinese population, it is necessary to define the optimal range of healthy weight and the appropriate cut‐off points of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference for Chinese adults. The Working Group on Obesity in China under the support of the International Life Sciences Institute Focal Point in China organized a meta‐analysis on the relationship between BMI, waist circumference and risk factors of related chronic diseases (e.g., high diabetes, diabetes mellitus, and lipoprotein disorders). Thirteen population studies in all met the criteria for enrolment, with data of 239 972 adults (20−70 years of age) surveyed in the 1990s. Data on waist circumference was available for 111 411 persons, and data on serum lipids and glucose were available for more than 80 000. The study populations were located in 21 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in mainland China as well as in Taiwan. Each enrolled study provided data according to a common protocol and uniform format. The Center for Data Management in the Department of Epidemiology, Fu Wai Hospital, was responsible for the statistical analysis. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and clustering of risk factors all increased with increasing levels of BMI or waist circumference. A BMI of 24 with best sensitivity and specificity for identification of the risk factors was recommended as the cut‐off point for overweight; a BMI of 28, which may identify the risk factors with specificity around 90%, was recommended as the cut‐off point for obesity. A waist circumference over 85 cm for men and over 80 cm for women were recommended as the cut‐off points for central obesity. Analysis of a population‐attributable risk percentage illustrated that reducing the BMI to the normal range (<24) could prevent 45−50% of the clustering of risk factors. Treatment of obese persons (BMI = 28) with drugs could prevent 15−17% of clustering of risk factors. When waist circumference is controlled at under 85 cm for men and under 80 cm for women, it could prevent 47−58% of clustering of risk factors. Based on these guidelines, a classification of overweight and obesity for Chinese adults is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,270

Metadata

Authors
Bei‐Fan, Z., & the Cooperative Meta‐analysis Group of Working Group on Obesity in China
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
11
Issue
s8
ISSN
  • 0964-7058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-6047
OpenAlex
W2139098554
Cited by
1,270
References
0
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults: study on optimal cut‐off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x
The paper
Bei‐Fan, Z., & the Cooperative Meta‐analysis Group of Working Group on Obesity in China. (2002). Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults: study on optimal cut‐off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.