The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia
Abstract
Australian floodplain wetlands are sites of high biodiversity that depend on flows from rivers. Dams, diversions and river management have reduced flooding to these wetlands, altering their ecology, and causing the death or poor health of aquatic biota. Four floodplain wetlands (Barmah‐Millewa Forest and Moira Marshes, Chowilla floodplain, Macquarie Marshes, Gwydir wetlands) illustrate these effects with successional changes in aquatic vegetation, reduced vegetation health, declining numbers of water‐birds and nesting, and declining native fish and invertebrate populations. These effects are likely to be widespread as Australia has at least 446 large dams (>10 m crest height) storing 8.8 × 10 7 ML (10 6 L) of water, much of which is diverted upstream of floodplain wetlands. More than 50% of floodplain wetlands on developed rivers may no longer flood. Of all of the river basins in Australia, the Murray‐Darling Basin is most affected with dams which can store 103% of annual runoff and 87% of divertible water extracted (1983–84 data). Some floodplain wetlands are now permanent storages. This has changed their biota from one tolerant of a variable flooding regime, to one that withstands permanent flooding. Plans exist to build dams to divert water from many rivers, mainly for irrigation. These plans seldom adequately model subsequent ecological and hydrological impacts to floodplain wetlands. To avoid further loss of wetlands, an improved understanding of the interaction between river flows and floodplain ecology, and investigations into ecological impacts of management practices, is essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation
Ward, J. V. (1998) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00083-9 · Cited by 731
Cited by
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur‐Richard, A., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J., et al. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006950 · Cited by 8,489
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
BUNN, S. E., & ARTHINGTON, A. H. (2002) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 · Cited by 3,379
Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends
Tockner, K., & Stanford, J. A. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s037689290200022x · Cited by 2,116
Wetlands: conservation's poor cousins
Kingsford, R. T., Basset, A., & Jackson, L. (2016) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2709 · Cited by 365
Self-citationLu, X. X., & Siew, R. Y. (2006) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-10-181-2006 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Kingsford, R. T.
- Venue
- Austral Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-127
- ISSN
- 1442-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1442-9993
- OpenAlex
- W2156358294
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x
- The paper
- Kingsford, R. T. (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.