The supramammillary nucleus contributes to associative EPSP‐spike potentiation in the rat dentate gyrus in vivo
Abstract
The supramammillary nucleus (SUM) of the hypothalamus sends neural projections to the hippocampus and is supposed to be involved in learning and memory. To test the possibility that SUM afferents modulate hippocampal functions, we investigated the effect of electrical stimulation of the SUM on the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) at medial perforant path (PP)--granule cell synapses in the dentate gyrus (DG) of anaesthetized rats. High-frequency stimulation of the SUM (100 pulses at 100 Hz) alone did not change PP--DG field potentials. However, when the SUM stimulation was applied simultaneously with weak tetanic stimulation of the PP (20 pulses at 20 Hz) which alone did not induce any potentiation, it produced a long-lasting potentiation of the population spike, without an accompanying increase in the population excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP). The EPSP-spike (E-S) potentiation induced by pairing SUM and PP stimulation was abolished by lesions of the fimbria--fornix, a major pathway of SUM afferents. SUM stimulation applied 1 s before or after PP stimulation failed to produce E-S potentiation, and SUM stimulation augmented PP--DG field potentials during tetanic stimulation. Furthermore, the E-S potentiation was abolished by blocking GABAergic neurotransmission with picrotoxin. These results suggest that coactivation of SUM and PP inputs produces a long-lasting increase of granule cell excitability by modulating GABAergic inhibition. SUM afferents may contribute to associative memory processing by modulating hippocampal excitability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Input from the hypothalamus and the locus coeruleus, via activation of β-adrenergic receptors, as well as dopaminergic innervation of the hippocampus from the VTA and local release of CRH, all appear to contribute to the rapid stress-induced enhancement of hippocampal LTP.
“In addition, input from the hypothalamus (Nakanishi et al. [216]) and the locus coeruleus (Harley and Sara [217]; Sara et al. [218]; Kitchigina et al. [219]; Bouret and Sara [220]), via activation of β-adrenergic receptors (Ikegaya et al. [221]; Vermetten and Bremner [8]; Strange and Dolan [222]; Nathan et al. [189]; Hurlemann et al. [223]), as well as the dopaminergic innervation of the”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Nakanishi et al. [216]
Cites
PHA-L analysis of projections from the supramammillary nucleus in the rat
Vertes, R. P. (1992) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903260408 · Cited by 299 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Secondly, potentiation of the population spike was induced by stimulation of the ipsilateral SUM rather than the contralateral SUM, consistent with anatomical evidence that the DG receives neural projections predominantly from the ipsilateral SUM (Haglund et al., 1984; Vertes, 1992).”
Result
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2007/60803 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“[216]), ventral tegmental area (Ovsepian et al.”
BackgroundReul, J. M. H. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00005 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Hashimotodani, Y., Karube, F., Yanagawa, Y., Fujiyama, F., & Kano, M. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.016 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Hypothalamic Supramammillary Control of Cognition and Motivation
Kesner, A. J., Mozaffarilegha, M., Thirtamara Rajamani, K., Arima, Y., Harony-Nicolas, H., Hashimotodani, Y., Ito, H. T., Song, J., & Ikemoto, S. (2023) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1320-23.2023 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nakanishi, K., Saito, H., & Abe, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Hoshi University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Abe, Kazuho
- ORCID
- Nakanishi, Kosuke
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 793-800
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2016072986
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- supramammillary nucleus, dentate gyrus, perforant path, long-term potentiation, associative memory, GABAergic inhibition, fimbria-fornix, hippocampal excitability, population spike, picrotoxin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hypothalamus, Posterior, Male, Picrotoxin, Receptors, GABA-A, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, GABA Antagonists, Dentate Gyrus, Perforant Pathway, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review