Cited by 159Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

Interaction of linear vestibular and visual stimulation in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)

Schlack, Anja, Hoffmann, Klaus‐Peter, Bremmer, Frank·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Navigation in space requires the brain to combine information arising from different sensory modalities with the appropriate motor commands. Sensory information about self-motion in particular is provided by the visual and the vestibular system. The macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP) has recently been shown to be involved in the processing of self-motion information provided by optical flow, to contain multimodal neurons and to receive input from areas involved in the analysis of vestibular information. By studying responses to linear vestibular, visual and bimodal stimulation we aimed at gaining more insight into the mechanisms involved in multimodal integration and self-motion processing. A large proportion of cells (77%) revealed a significant response to passive linear translation of the monkey. Of these cells, 59% encoded information about the direction of self-motion. The phase relationship between vestibular stimulation and neuronal responses covered a broad spectrum, demonstrating the complexity of the spatio-temporal pattern of vestibular information encoded by neurons in area VIP. For 53% of the direction-selective neurons the preferred directions for stimuli of both modalities were the same; they were opposite for the remaining 47% of the neurons. During bimodal stimulation the responses of neurons with opposite direction selectivity in the two modalities were determined either by the visual (53%) or the vestibular (47%) modality. These heterogeneous responses to unimodal and bimodal stimulation might be used to prevent misjudgements about self- and/or object-motion, which could be caused by relying on information of one sensory modality alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02251.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 159

Authors
Schlack, A., Hoffmann, K., & Bremmer, F.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Bremmer, Frank
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1877-1886
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2153120159
Cited by
159
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
ventral intraparietal area, vestibular stimulation, visual stimulation, bimodal stimulation, direction selectivity, multimodal integration, linear translation, optical flow, macaque, sensory integration, object motion perception
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motion Perception, Neurons, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Vestibular Nuclei

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review