The effect of bilateral deafness on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic strength in the inferior colliculus
Abstract
The consequences of deafness on the central auditory nervous system have been examined at many levels, from molecular to functional. However, there has never been a direct and selective measurement of excitatory synaptic function following total hearing loss. In the present study, gerbils were deafened at postnatal day 9, an age at which there is no deafferentation-induced cell death of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. One to five days after bilateral cochlear ablation, the amplitude of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) was measured with whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings in an inferior colliculus (IC) brain slice preparation in response to electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral lateral lemniscus (LL) or the commissure of the inferior colliculus (CIC). Deafness resulted in larger LL- and CIC-evoked EPSC amplitudes and durations. This result was observed at a depolarized holding potential. In addition, deafness caused a decrease in excitatory neurotransmitter release at the LL pathway, as assessed with a paired-pulse stimulation protocol. In contrast to its effect on excitatory synapses, bilateral cochlear ablation reduced inhibitory synaptic strength in IC neurons. The effects included a postsynaptic decrease in IPSC conductance, a 25-mV depolarization in the IPSC equilibrium potential and a decrease of neurotransmitter release. Thus normal innervation differentially affects excitatory and inhibitory synaptic strength in IC neurons, and these changes may con…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inhibitory synapses onto pyramidal neurons are regulated in the opposite direction from excitatory synapses in response to a drop in activity or sensory drive, both in vitro and in vivo.
“Further, it has been shown both in vitro and in vivo that inhibitory synapses onto pyramidal neurons are regulated in the opposite direction from excitatory synapses in response to a drop in activity or sensory drive (Kilman et al. 2002;Vale and Sanes 2002;Maffei et al. 2004;Hartman et al. 2006;Huupponen et al. 2007).”
From Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function (2012) · cites this paper as Vale and Sanes 2002
Cites
Thomson, A. M., Deuchars, J., & West, D. C. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2354 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system
Turrigiano, G. G., & Nelson, S. B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1327 · Cited by 2,485 · see citing works
Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function
Turrigiano, G. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005736 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Too many cooks? Intrinsic and synaptic homeostatic mechanisms in cortical circuit refinement
Turrigiano, G. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153238 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis
Auerbach, B. D., Rodrigues, P. V., & Salvi, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00206 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment
Pienkowski, M., Tyler, R. S., Roncancio, E. R., Jun, H. J., Brozoski, T., Dauman, N., Coelho, C. B., Andersson, G., Keiner, A. J., Cacace, A. T., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2014_aja-13-0037 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Joseph, A., & Turrigiano, G. G. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0618-17.2017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception.
Schilling, A., Sedley, W., Gerum, R., Metzner, C., Tziridis, K., Maier, A., Schulze, H., Zeng, F.-G., Friston, K. J., & Krauss, P. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad255 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vale, C., & Sanes, D. H.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sanes, Dan H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2394-2404
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1996809637
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-00540)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- bilateral deafness, inferior colliculus, cochlear ablation, sensory deprivation, excitatory postsynaptic currents, inhibitory postsynaptic currents, neurotransmitter release, lateral lemniscus, auditory brainstem, gerbils
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Auditory Pathways, Cochlea, Deafness, Electric Stimulation, Gerbillinae, Inferior Colliculi, Functional Laterality, Membrane Potentials, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review