The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential effects of tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula on root colonization and tree seedling growth: implications for tropical forest diversity
Abstract
The potential for mycorrhizae to influence the diversity and structuring of plant communities depends on whether their affinities and effects differ across a suite of potential host species. In order to assess this potential for a tropical forest community in Panama, we conducted three reciprocal inoculation experiments using seedlings from six native tree species. Seeds were germinated in sterile soil and then exposed to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in current association with naturally infected roots from adults of either the same or different species growing in intact forest. The tree species represent a range of life histories, including early successional pioneers, a persistent understory species, and emergent species, typical of mature forest. Collectively, these experiments show: (i) the seedlings of small‐seeded pioneer species were more dependent on mycorrhizal inocula for initial survival and growth; (ii) although mycorrhizal fungi from all inocula were able to colonize the roots of all host species, the inoculum potential (the infectivity of an inoculum of a given concentration) and root colonization varied depending on the identity of the host seedling and the source of the inoculum; and (iii) different mycorrhizal fungal inocula also produced differences in growth depending on the host species. These differences indicate that host–mycorrhizal fungal interactions in tropical forests are characterized by greater complexity than has previously been demonstrated, and suggest that tropical mycorrhizal fungal communities have the potential to differentially influence seedling recruitment among host species and thereby affect community composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
Klironomos, J. N. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0413 · Cited by 1,213
Bever, J. D. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2162 · Cited by 438
Husband, R., Herre, E. A., Turner, S. L., Gallery, R., & Young, J. P. W. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01647.x · Cited by 405
Self-citationLovelock, C. E., Wright, S. F., Clark, D. A., & Ruess, R. W. (2004) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00855.x · Cited by 295
Self-citationThe Potential Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Restoration of Degraded Lands
Asmelash, F., Bekele, T., & Birhane, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01095 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiers, E. T., Lovelock, C. E., Krueger, E. L., & Herre, E. A.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-113
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2080370348
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential effects of tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula on root colonization and tree seedling growth: implications for tropical forest diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00126.x
- The paper
- Kiers, E. T., Lovelock, C. E., Krueger, E. L., & Herre, E. A. (2000). Differential effects of tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula on root colonization and tree seedling growth: implications for tropical forest diversity. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00126.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.