The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple influences of nitrate on uranium solubility during bioremediation of uranium‐contaminated subsurface sediments
Abstract
Summary: Microbiological reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) has been proposed as a remediation strategy for uranium‐contaminated groundwater. Nitrate is a common co‐contaminant with uranium. Nitrate inhibited U(VI) reduction in acetate‐amended aquifer sediments collected from a uranium‐contaminated site in New Mexico. Once nitrate was depleted, both U(VI) and Fe(III) were reduced concurrently. When nitrate was added to sediments in which U(VI) had been reduced, U(VI) reappeared in solution. Parallel studies with the dissimilatory Fe(III)‐, U(VI)‐ and nitrate‐reducing microorganism, Geobacter metallireducens, demonstrated that nitrate inhibited reduction of Fe(III) and U(VI) in cell suspensions of cells that had been grown with nitrate as the electron acceptor, but not in Fe(III)‐grown cells. Suspensions of nitrate‐grown G. metallireducens oxidized Fe(II) and U(IV) with nitrate as the electron acceptor. U(IV) oxidation was accelerated when Fe(II) was also added, presumably due to the Fe(III) being formed abiotically oxidizing U(IV). These studies demonstrate that although the presence of nitrate is not likely to be an impediment to the bioremediation of uranium contamination with microbial U(VI) reduction, it is necessary to reduce nitrate before U(VI) can be reduced. These results also suggest that anaerobic oxidation of U(IV) to U(VI) with nitrate serving as the electron acceptor may provide a novel strategy for solubilizing and extracting microbial U(IV) precipitates from the subsurface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caccavo, F., Lonergan, D. J., Lovley, D. R., Davis, M., Stolz, J. F., & McInerney, M. J. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.10.3752-3759.1994 · Cited by 896
Self-citationDeep subsurface microbial processes
Lovley, D. R., & Chapelle, F. H. (1995) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/95rg01305 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Cited by
Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) Reduction
Lovley, D. R., Holmes, D. E., & Nevin, K. P. (2004) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(04)49005-5 · Cited by 1,471
Self-citationRemediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater
Hashim, M. A., Mukhopadhyay, S., Sahu, J. N., & Sengupta, B. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.009 · Cited by 961
Graphite electrodes as electron donors for anaerobic respiration
Gregory, K. B., Bond, D. R., & Lovley, D. R. (2004) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00593.x · Cited by 772
Self-citationMicrobial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.002 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Finneran, K. T., Housewright, M. E., & Lovley, D. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 510-516
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1997202712
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple influences of nitrate on uranium solubility during bioremediation of uranium‐contaminated subsurface sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00317.x
- The paper
- Finneran, K. T., Housewright, M. E., & Lovley, D. R. (2002). Multiple influences of nitrate on uranium solubility during bioremediation of uranium‐contaminated subsurface sediments. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00317.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.