The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of a clinical score in the assessment of ambiguous genitalia
Abstract
Objective To improve the initial assessment of ambiguous genitalia in infants. Subjects and methods Using a specially devised scoring system, the external genitalia (external masculinization score, EMS, range 0–12) and internal reproductive structures (internal masculinization score, IMS, range 0–10) were assessed in 426 male newborns and 291 cases of ambiguous genitalia. Results In normal male newborns, the median (10th centile) EMS was 11 (10). In the affected infants, the sex of rearing was male in 202 and female in 89 cases, respectively. The median (10–90th centile) EMS in those cases reared male, at 3.5 (2–8), was significantly higher than in cases reared as females, at 2 (1–6) ( P < 0.001). The median IMS in cases reared as males and females was the same, at 10, but the scatter of values was higher for males (10–90th centile, 4–10) than for females (0–10) ( P = 0.01). Infants reared as females were more likely to have a micropenis, a uterus and/or a urogenital sinus, but there were 12 cases where the sex of rearing was male despite the presence of a uterus; five infants without micropenis were reared as female and 23 with a urogenital sinus were reared as male. Conclusion The masculinization score provides a standardized format to summarize clinical features in newborn infants with ambiguous genitalia. Gender assignment does not solely depend on the appearance of the external genitalia and the nature of internal sexual organs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disorders of sex development: a new definition and classification
Hughes, I. A. (2008) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 438
Self-citationThe external genitalia score (EGS): a European multicenter validation study
van der Straaten, S., Springer, A., Zecic, A., Hebenstreit, D., Tonnhofer, U., Gawlik, A., Baumert, M., Szeliga, K., Debulpaep, S., Desloovere, A., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz142 · Cited by 135
Self-citationNordenström, A., Ahmed, S. F., van den Akker, E., Blair, J., Bonomi, M., Brachet, C., Broersen, L. H. A., Claahsen-van der Grinten, H. L., Dessens, A. B., Gawlik, A., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-22-0073 · Cited by 108
Self-citationCan boys have Turner syndrome? More than a question of semantics
Knoll, M. M., Strickland, J., & Jacobson, J. D. (2022) · Sexual Development · doi:10.1159/000518092 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmed, S. F., Khwaja, O., & Hughes, I. A.
- Venue
- BJU International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-124
- ISSN
- 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-410X
- OpenAlex
- W2092552234
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of a clinical score in the assessment of ambiguous genitalia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00354.x
- The paper
- Ahmed, S. F., Khwaja, O., & Hughes, I. A. (2000). The role of a clinical score in the assessment of ambiguous genitalia. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00354.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.