Cited by 125Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with long‐acting versus short‐acting sulphonylureas

Open access
Stahl, M., Berger, W.·1999·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Aims A comparison of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with long vs. short‐acting sulphonylureas. Methods A community based study over a 12‐year period in the population of the city of Basle, Switzerland. The number of diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents was established on the basis of tablet consumption and a defined daily dose, e.g. 7.5 mg for glibenclamide, and 50 mg for glibornuride. Results Twenty‐eight Type 2 diabetic patients were admitted for severe hypo‐ glycaemia, with a median age of 73 years. There were no deaths. Sixteen of these admissions were patients treated with long‐acting sulphonylureas and 12 were patients treated with short‐acting forms. Only 23.5% of the population with Type 2 DM in Basle were treated with long‐acting sulphonylureas. With 30 345 person‐years of observation, the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was 2.24 per 1000 person‐years for long‐acting sulphonylureas vs. 0.75 per 1000 person‐year for short‐acting forms, odds ratio 3.01 (95% confidence interval 1.35–6.77). Decreased food intake (nine patients) was a major contributing factor. Conclusions Severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission is more common in elderly Type 2 diabetic patients treated with long‐acting compared to short‐acting sulphonylureas. Such long‐acting sulphonylureas should be avoided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00110.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of hypoglycemia of each sulfonylurea relates to its pharmacokinetic properties and is highest with long-acting sulfonylureas such as chlorpropamide, glyburide (glibenclamide), and long-acting glipizide.

    “The risk of hypoglycemia of each sulfonylurea relates to its pharmacokinetic properties (104 -108) and is highest with long-acting sulfonylureas such as chlorpropamide, glyburide (glibenclamide), and long-acting glipizide (101,109 -111).”

    From Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (2005) · cites this paper as [109]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 125

Authors
Stahl, M., & Berger, W.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Stahl, M.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
586-590
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2035926403
Cited by
125
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
severe hypoglycemia, type 2 diabetes, hospitalization, glibenclamide, elderly patients, hypoglycaemia incidence, hypophagia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Emergencies, Female, Glyburide, Hospitals, University, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Switzerland, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review