Higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with long‐acting versus short‐acting sulphonylureas
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Aims A comparison of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with long vs. short‐acting sulphonylureas. Methods A community based study over a 12‐year period in the population of the city of Basle, Switzerland. The number of diabetic patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents was established on the basis of tablet consumption and a defined daily dose, e.g. 7.5 mg for glibenclamide, and 50 mg for glibornuride. Results Twenty‐eight Type 2 diabetic patients were admitted for severe hypo‐ glycaemia, with a median age of 73 years. There were no deaths. Sixteen of these admissions were patients treated with long‐acting sulphonylureas and 12 were patients treated with short‐acting forms. Only 23.5% of the population with Type 2 DM in Basle were treated with long‐acting sulphonylureas. With 30 345 person‐years of observation, the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was 2.24 per 1000 person‐years for long‐acting sulphonylureas vs. 0.75 per 1000 person‐year for short‐acting forms, odds ratio 3.01 (95% confidence interval 1.35–6.77). Decreased food intake (nine patients) was a major contributing factor. Conclusions Severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission is more common in elderly Type 2 diabetic patients treated with long‐acting compared to short‐acting sulphonylureas. Such long‐acting sulphonylureas should be avoided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk of hypoglycemia of each sulfonylurea relates to its pharmacokinetic properties and is highest with long-acting sulfonylureas such as chlorpropamide, glyburide (glibenclamide), and long-acting glipizide.
“The risk of hypoglycemia of each sulfonylurea relates to its pharmacokinetic properties (104 -108) and is highest with long-acting sulfonylureas such as chlorpropamide, glyburide (glibenclamide), and long-acting glipizide (101,109 -111).”
From Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (2005) · cites this paper as [109]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Stahl, M., & Berger, W.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Stahl, M.
- ORCID
- Stahl, M.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 586-590
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2035926403
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- severe hypoglycemia, type 2 diabetes, hospitalization, glibenclamide, elderly patients, hypoglycaemia incidence, hypophagia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Emergencies, Female, Glyburide, Hospitals, University, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Switzerland, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review