Post‐prandial glucose excursions following four methods of bolus insulin administration in subjects with Type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Aims To determine if one method of short-acting insulin bolus administration is superior to other methods in managing a meal high in carbohydrates, calories and fat. Methods Nine subjects receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin lispro (Humalog) agreed to consume the same meal high in carbohydrates, calories and fat on four occasions 1 week apart. They received the same dose of bolus insulin on each of the four occasions randomly assigned and beginning 10 min prior to the meal as either a single bolus, two separate boluses of one-half the same total dose (the second after 90 min), the entire bolus given as a square-wave (over 2 h) or a dual-wave (70% as a bolus and 30% as a square-wave over 2 h). Blood glucose levels were measured at -60 and -30 min and at zero time, and then every half-hour for 6 h using the Hemacue in the out-patient clinic. Results Changes in blood glucose values from fasting were the lowest after 90 and 120 min (P Conclusions We conclude that the dual wave provided the most effective method of insulin administration for this meal. The dual- and square-wave therapies resulted in lower glucose levels 4 h after the meal in comparison with the single and double-bolus treatments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensor‐augmented pump systems (SAP) enable adaptive insulin delivery, including dual‐wave or square‐wave boluses, which distribute insulin over several hours and better match the slow and prolonged glucose absorption typical of DGP, particularly in high‐fat or high‐protein meals.
“Sensor‑augmented pump systems (SAP) enable adaptive insulin delivery, including dual‑wave or square‑wave boluses, which distribute insulin over several hours and better match the slow and prolonged glucose absorption typical of DGP [54, 112, 132, 148, 149], particularly in high‑fat or high‑protein meals [150–152].”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [151]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Chase, H. P., Saib, S. Z., MacKenzie, T., Hansen, M. M., & Garg, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chase, H. P.
- ORCID
- MacKenzie, T.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-321
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2087267055
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000069)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, insulin lispro, insulin pump therapy, postprandial glucose excursions, glycemic control, high-carbohydrate meal
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Fasting, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Time Factors, Postprandial Period, Insulin Lispro
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review