The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current methods of transfer of young people with Type 1 diabetes to adult services
Abstract
Aims To determine the efficacy and patient perception of various transfer procedures from paediatric to adult diabetes services. Methods Comparison between four districts in the Oxford Region employing different transfer methods, by retrospective study of case records and interviews of patients recently transferred from paediatric diabetes clinics. The main outcome measures were age at transfer, clinic attendance rates, HbA 1c measurements and questionnaire responses. Results Two hundred and twenty‐nine subjects (57% males) > 18 years old in 1998 and diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes < 16 years of age between 1985 and 1995, identified from the regional diabetes register. The notes audit was completed for 222 (97%) and 164 (72%) were interviewed by a single research nurse. Mean age at transfer was 17.9 years (range 13.3–22.4 years). Few young people were lost to follow‐up at the point of transfer. There was a high rate of clinic attendance (at least 6 monthly) 2 years pretransfer (94%), but this declined to 57% 2 years post‐transfer (P < 0.0005). There was large interdistrict variation in clinic attendance 2 years post‐transfer (29% to 71%); higher rates were seen in districts where young people had the opportunity to meet the adult diabetes consultant prior to transfer. The importance of this opportunity was confirmed by questionnaire responses on interview. Conclusions Adolescence is a vulnerable period for patients with diabetes. This regional survey demonstrated a marked decline in clinic attendance around the time of transition from paediatric to adult services. The reasons are complex, but mode of transfer may be an important factor. Diabet. Med 19, 649–654 (2002)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improving the transition between paediatric and adult healthcare: a systematic review
Crowley, R., Wolfe, I., Lock, K., & McKee, M. (2011) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2010.202473 · Cited by 649
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services
Campbell, F., Biggs, K., Aldiss, S. K., O'Neill, P. M., Clowes, M., McDonagh, J., While, A., & Gibson, F. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009794.pub2 · Cited by 522
Gabriel, P., McManus, M., Rogers, K., & White, P. (2017) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.066 · Cited by 312
Yuen, K. C. J., Biller, B. M. K., Radovick, S., Carmichael, J. D., Jasim, S., Pantalone, K. M., & Hoffman, A. R. (2019) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2019-0405 · Cited by 298
Holmes‐Walker, D. J., Llewellyn, A. C., & Farrell, K. (2007) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02152.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Kipps, S., Bahu, T., Ong, K., Ackland, F. M., Brown, R. S., Fox, C. T., Griffin, N. K., Knight, A. H., Mann, N. P., Neil, H. A. W., Simpson, H., Edge, J. A., & Dunger, D. B.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 649-654
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2129382615
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current methods of transfer of young people with Type 1 diabetes to adult services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00757.x
- The paper
- Kipps, S., Bahu, T., Ong, K., Ackland, F. M., Brown, R. S., Fox, C. T., Griffin, N. K., Knight, A. H., Mann, N. P., Neil, H. A. W., Simpson, H., Edge, J. A., & Dunger, D. B. (2002). Current methods of transfer of young people with Type 1 diabetes to adult services. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00757.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.