Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 936

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies

Asner, Gregory P., Scurlock, Jonathan M. O., A. Hicke, Jeffrey·2003·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Aim We present the first global synthesis of plant canopy leaf area index (LAI) measurements from more than 1000 published estimates representing ∼400 unique field sites. LAI is a key variable for regional and global models of biosphere‐atmosphere exchanges of energy, carbon dioxide, water vapour, and other materials. Location The location is global, geographically distributed. Results Biomes with LAI values well represented in the literature included croplands, forests and plantations. Biomes not well represented were deserts, shrublands, tundra and wetlands. Nearly 40% of the records in the database were published in the past 10 years (1991–2000), with a further 20% collected between 1981 and 1990. Mean (± SD) LAI, distributed between 15 biome classes, ranged from 1.3 ± 0.9 for deserts to 8.7 ± 4.3 for tree plantations, with temperate evergreen forests (needleleaf and broadleaf) displaying the highest average LAI (5.1–6.7) among the natural terrestrial vegetation classes. Following a statistical outlier analysis, the global mean (± SD) LAI decreased from 5.2 (4.1) to 4.5 (2.5), with a maximum LAI of 18. Biomes with the highest LAI values were plantations > temperate evergreen forests > wetlands. Those with the lowest LAI values were deserts < grasslands < tundra. Mean LAI values for all biomes did not differ statistically by the methodology employed. Direct and indirect measurement approaches produced similar LAI results. Mean LAI values for all biomes combined decreased significantly in the 1990s, a period of substantially more studies and improved methodologies. Main conclusions Applications of the LAI database span a wide range of ecological, biogeochemical, physical, and climate research areas. The data provide input to terrestrial ecosystem and land‐surface models, for evaluation of global remote sensing products, for comparisons to field studies, and other applications. Example uses of the database for global plant productivity, fractional energy absorption, and remote sensing studies are highlighted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00026.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1080/01431160050110188 · doi:10.1080/01431160050110188
  2. 10.1093/treephys/18.3.185 · doi:10.1093/treephys/18.3.185
  3. 10.1109/36.387593 · doi:10.1109/36.387593
  4. 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00195-6 · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(95)00195-6
  5. Chen J.M., 1997, Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques and measurements, Journal of Geophysics Research — Atmospheres, 102, 29
  6. 10.2307/1937474 · doi:10.2307/1937474
  7. 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00068-6 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00068-6
  8. 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00042-4 · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00042-4
  9. 10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00064-1 · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(98)00064-1
  10. 10.1029/1999JD900101 · doi:10.1029/1999jd900101
  11. 10.1016/0022-4073(93)90003-Z · doi:10.1016/0022-4073(93)90003-z
  12. Olson R.J., 2001, Global and regional ecosystem modeling: databases of model drivers and validation measurements., 81
  13. 10.1007/BF00142431 · doi:10.1007/bf00142431
  14. Schulze E.‐D., 1982, Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New Series, 12B, 615
  15. Scurlock et al., 1996, Article title, Journal, 00, 000
  16. 10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0022:TFIFE>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069
  17. Sokal R.R., 1981, Biometry, 413
  18. 10.1007/BF00036048 · doi:10.1007/bf00036048
  19. 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00119-X · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00119-x
  20. 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00012-1 · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00012-1

Cited by

See all 936

Metadata

Authors
Asner, G. P., Scurlock, J. M. O., & A. Hicke, J.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-11
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
191-205
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W2161491521
Cited by
936
References
30
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00026.x
The paper
Asner, G. P., Scurlock, J. M. O., & A. Hicke, J. (2003). Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00026.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.