The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Work-Related Disability: Results From the American Migraine Study
Abstract
Migraine headache is a highly prevalent, often severely painful and frequently disabling disorder. The indirect costs related to disability greatly exceed the direct cost of medical care. The objective of this paper is to describe work-related disability associated with migraine headache and predictors of disability. In a two-stage survey of the US population, we estimate missed workdays and impairment at work in a sample of 1663 migraine sufferers, age 18 years and older. Lost workday equivalents (LWDE) was derived as the sum of actual missed workdays and the product of percentage effectiveness at work and days at work with the most severe headache. Overall, reported actual lost workdays and reduced effectiveness at work contributed approximately equally to total LWDE. A total of 51.1% of females and 38.1% of male migraineurs experienced six or more LWDE per year. This subgroup of migraine sufferers accounted for about 90% of the total LWDE experienced by all respondents. Among women, headache duration was the strongest predictor of LWDE followed by less significant associations with number of symptoms and pain level. Among men, only pain level was significantly associated with LWDE. Among sociodemographic factors, disability was more likely among older (40+) subjects and less likely among individuals with higher education and higher income (females only), even after adjusting for headache features. Health-care interventions may yield the greatest individual benefit (by reducing pain and disability) and the greatest societal benefit (by reducing indirect costs) if they are directed to those who account for the greatest proportion of disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Diamond, M., Freitag, F., Reed, M. L., & Stewart, W. F. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21 · Cited by 2,337
Self-citationLost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2443 · Cited by 1,570
Self-citationBurden of Migraine in the United States: Disability and Economic Costs
Hu, X. H., Markson, L. E., Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., & Berger, M. L. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.8.813 · Cited by 910
Self-citationRasmussen, B. (1995) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.1995.1501045.x · Cited by 731
An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score
Stewart, W. F., Lipton, R. B., Whyte, J., Dowson, A., Kolodner, K., Liberman, J. N., & Sawyer, J. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.5.988 · Cited by 621
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, W., Lipton, R., & Simon, D.
- Venue
- Cephalalgia
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 231-238
- ISSN
- 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2007075131
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work-Related Disability: Results From the American Migraine Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1604231.x
- The paper
- Stewart, W., Lipton, R., & Simon, D. (1996). Work-Related Disability: Results From the American Migraine Study. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1604231.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.