The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency and normal karyotype
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nuchal translucency measurements and outcome of pregnancy with special regard to fetuses with an enlarged nuchal translucency and a normal karyotype. Fetal nuchal translucency measurements were performed on consecutive mothers attending the prenatal diagnosis center of our hospital. A complete follow‐up was obtained in 88.4% of the cases. Of the 74 fetuses (4.4%) with an enlarged nuchal translucency (<3 mm), 25 (33.8%) had an abnormal karyotype. Two pregnancies ended in a spontaneous abortion before karyotyping was performed. In the remain‐ing 47 eukaryotic fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency, five (10.6%) had a structural anomaly, two were affected by genetic syndromes (4.2%) and an additional four fetuses (8.5%) were affected by a single‐gene disorder. A spontaneous abortion or an intrauterine death occurred in 6.4% and in 2.1% of these fetuses, respectively. The total incidence of an unfavorable outcome in the group of chromosomally normal fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency was 32%. In contrast, in the group with a normal nuchal translucency (+3 mm), the incidence of an unfavorable outcome was 7.5%. There is a strong association between enlarged nuchal translucency measurements and congenital (structural and genetic) abnormalities, as assessed by receiver operator characteristic analysis. This may represent, in fetuses with a normal karyotype, a non‐specific sign of a disturbance in the developmental process. In these cases, detailed ultrasound surveillance is recommended. Copyright © 1998 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Souka, A. P., Krampl, E., Bakalis, S., Heath, V., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x · Cited by 369
Karim, J. N., Roberts, N. W., Salomon, L. J., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17246 · Cited by 266
Ritchie, K., Bradbury, I., Slattery, J., Wright, D., Iqbal, K., & Penney, G. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00560.x · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilardo, C. M., Pajkrt, E., de Graaf, I., Mol, B. W., & Bleker, O. P.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 401-406
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2061514086
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency and normal karyotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11060401.x
- The paper
- Bilardo, C. M., Pajkrt, E., de Graaf, I., Mol, B. W., & Bleker, O. P. (1998). Outcome of fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency and normal karyotype. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11060401.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.