The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound investigation in well‐defined European populations. Design: Data from 20 registries of congenital malformations in 12 European countries were included. The prenatal ultrasound screening programs in the countries ranged from no routine screening to three ultrasound investigations per patient routinely performed. Results: There were 2454 cases with congenital heart disease with an overall prenatal detection rate of 25%. Termination of pregnancy was performed in 293 cases (12%). There was considerable variation in prenatal detection rate between regions, with the lowest detection rates being in countries without ultrasound screening (11%) and in Eastern European countries (Croatia, Lithuania and Ukraine; 8%). In Western European countries with ultrasound screening, detection rate ranged from 19–48%. There was a significant difference in prenatal detection rate and proportion of induced abortions between isolated congenital heart disease and congenital heart disease associated with chromosome anomalies, multiple malformations and syndromes (P < 0.0001). There were 1694 cases with isolated congenital heart disease of which 16% were diagnosed prenatally. Malformations affecting the size of the ventricles were detected prenatally in half of the cases. Conclusions: Prenatal detection rate of congenital heart disease varies significantly between countries even with the same screening recommendations. The presence of associated malformations significantly increases the prenatal detection rate. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Donofrio, M. T., Moon-Grady, A. J., Hornberger, L. K., Copel, J. A., Sklansky, M. S., Abuhamad, A., Cuneo, B. F., Huhta, J. C., Jonas, R. A., Krishnan, A., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d · Cited by 1,275
Ewer, A. K., Middleton, L. J., Furmston, A. T., Bhoyar, A., Daniels, J. P., Thangaratinam, S., Deeks, J. J., & Khan, K. S. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60753-8 · Cited by 326
Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease
Friedberg, M. K., Silverman, N. H., Moon-Grady, A. J., Tong, E., Nourse, J., Sorenson, B., Lee, J., & Hornberger, L. K. (2009) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.050 · Cited by 299
Khoshnood, B., De Vigan, C., Vodovar, V., Goujard, J., Lhomme, A., Bonnet, D., & Goffinet, F. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0516 · Cited by 302
Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe
Garne, E., Loane, M., Dolk, H., De Vigan, C., Scarano, G., Tucker, D., Stoll, C., Gener, B., Pierini, A., Nelen, V., et al. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1784 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garne, E., Stoll, C., & Clementi, M.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 386-391
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W1990787173
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x
- The paper
- Garne, E., Stoll, C., & Clementi, M. (2001). Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.