Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac diameter in pregnancies 28–42 days from the last menstrual period can predict whether a pregnancy results in a normal term birth or a spontaneous miscarriage. Design: Gestational sac diameter was measured during the 4th and 5th weeks of gestation from the last menstrual period in 67 women who had a total of 102 ultrasound scans. These pregnancies were followed until one of two outcomes occurred: term gestation (n = 32) or spontaneous miscarriage (n = 35). Gestational sac diameter as a function of gestational age was compared in each of the groups. Results: The mean diameter of the gestational sac at 28–35 days from the last menstrual period among normal pregnancies did not differ significantly from that in those that subsequently miscarried (2.6 mm vs. 2.7 mm; P = 1.00). In pregnancies 36–42 days from the last menstrual period, the mean sac diameter was significantly different between the two groups (normal group, mean sac diameter, 8.2 mm and miscarriage group, mean sac diameter, 4.5 mm; P < 0.001). Conclusion: There is no difference in gestational sac diameter at 28–35 days from the last menstrual period in normal and abnormal pregnancies. However, smaller than expected sac diameter in pregnancies 36–42 days from the last menstrual period is predictive of spontaneous miscarriage. Copyright © 2002 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sonographic findings in early pregnancy have prognostic value in predicting pregnancy outcomes.
“Several studies have demonstrated that sonographic findings in early pregnancy have prognostic value in predicting pregnancy outcomes.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Oh, J. S., Wright, G., & Coulam, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Mercy Hospital and Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oh, J. S.
- ORCID
- Coulam, C. B.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-269
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W1996978519
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- gestational sac diameter, miscarriage, fetal outcome prediction, transvaginal ultrasound, early pregnancy, term birth, gestational age
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review