Cited by 64Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome

Oh, J. S., Wright, G., Coulam, C. B.·2002·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac diameter in pregnancies 28–42 days from the last menstrual period can predict whether a pregnancy results in a normal term birth or a spontaneous miscarriage. Design: Gestational sac diameter was measured during the 4th and 5th weeks of gestation from the last menstrual period in 67 women who had a total of 102 ultrasound scans. These pregnancies were followed until one of two outcomes occurred: term gestation (n = 32) or spontaneous miscarriage (n = 35). Gestational sac diameter as a function of gestational age was compared in each of the groups. Results: The mean diameter of the gestational sac at 28–35 days from the last menstrual period among normal pregnancies did not differ significantly from that in those that subsequently miscarried (2.6 mm vs. 2.7 mm; P = 1.00). In pregnancies 36–42 days from the last menstrual period, the mean sac diameter was significantly different between the two groups (normal group, mean sac diameter, 8.2 mm and miscarriage group, mean sac diameter, 4.5 mm; P < 0.001). Conclusion: There is no difference in gestational sac diameter at 28–35 days from the last menstrual period in normal and abnormal pregnancies. However, smaller than expected sac diameter in pregnancies 36–42 days from the last menstrual period is predictive of spontaneous miscarriage. Copyright © 2002 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00774.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 64

Authors
Oh, J. S., Wright, G., & Coulam, C. B.
Affiliations
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Oh, J. S.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
267-269
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1996978519
Cited by
64
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
gestational sac diameter, miscarriage, fetal outcome prediction, transvaginal ultrasound, early pregnancy, term birth, gestational age
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review