The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere microorganisms
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can reduce the incidence and importance of plant root diseases caused by pathogens. The mechanisms involved are not well characterized. We used an in vitro experimental system to test the hypothesis that the extraradical mycelium of AM fungi can interfere directly with microorganisms in the mycosphere and directly or indirectly reduce the population of plant pathogens. This system permitted the isolation of soluble substances released by the extraradical mycelium of Glomus intraradices. The AM fungus was grown on Daucus carota transformed roots in one compartment, while only the extraradical mycelium was allowed to grow in a second compartment. A freezing and centrifugation technique was developed for the extraction and concentration of substances present in the compartment containing only the AM fungal mycelium. Four soil‐inhabiting microorganisms were selected, and conidial germination (fungi) or growth (bacteria) of these was studied in the presence and absence (control) of the extract. In comparison with the control, the results indicated that both the growth of Pseudomonas chlororaphis and the conidial germination of Trichoderma harzianum were stimulated in the presence of the AM fungal extract. In contrast, conidial germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. chrysanthemi was reduced while the growth of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis was not affected. The measured effects in general were directly correlated with extract concentration. Differences in pH were noted between the extract containing substances released by the AM fungus and the non‐AM control, but no significant influence of the pH on growth or conidial germination was noted, confirming that substances released by the AM fungus in the growth medium is the main factor explaining differential growth of the microorganisms tested. The results suggest that direct interactions exist between AM fungi and soil microorganisms, which might lead to changes in microbial equilibrium detrimental to pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere
Whipps, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487 · Cited by 1,934
Mycorrhizas and soil structure
Rillig, M. C., & Mummey, D. L. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x · Cited by 1,761
Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition
Jones, D. L., Hodge, A., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01130.x · Cited by 1,371
Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes
Rillig, M. C. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00620.x · Cited by 606
Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens
Whipps, J. M. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b04-082 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- FILION, M., ST‐ARNAUD, M., & FORTIN, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 525-533
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1996338122
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00366.x
- The paper
- FILION, M., ST‐ARNAUD, M., & FORTIN, J. A. (1999). Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere microorganisms. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00366.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.