The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer
Abstract
This study explored reflectance indices sampled with a ‘leaf reflectometer’ as measures of pigment content for leaves of contrasting light history, developmental stage and functional type (herbaceous annual versus sclerophyllous evergreen). We employed three reflectance indices: a modified normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), an index of chlorophyll content; the red/green reflectance ratio (RRED∶RGREEN), an index of anthocyanin content; and the change in photochemical reflectance index upon dark–light conversions (ΔPRI), an index of xanthophyll cycle pigment activity. In Helianthus annuus (sunflower), xanthophyll cycle pigment amounts were linearly related to growth light environment; leaves in full sun contained approximately twice the amount of xanthophyll cycle pigments as leaves in deep shade, and at midday a larger proportion of these pigments were in the photoprotective, de‐epoxidized forms relative to shade leaves. Reflectance indices also revealed contrasting patterns of pigment development in leaves of contrasting structural types (annual versus evergreen). In H. annuus sun leaves, there was a remarkably rapid increase in amounts of both chlorophyll and xanthophyll cycle pigments along a leaf developmental sequence. This pattern contrasted with that of Quercus agrifolia (coast live oak, a sclerophyllous evergreen), which exhibited a gradual development of both chlorophyll and xanthophyll cycle pigments along with a pronounced peak of anthocyanin pigment content in newly expanding leaves. These temporal patterns of pigment development in Q. agrifolia leaves suggest that anthocyanins and xanthophyll cycle pigments serve complementary photoprotective roles during early leaf development. The results illustrate the use of reflectance indices for distinguishing divergent patterns of pigment activity in leaves of contrasting light history and functional type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carotenoid composition in sun and shade leaves of plants with different life forms
DEMMIG‐ADAMS, B., & ADAMS, W. W. (1992) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00991.x · Cited by 232
Cited by
Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally
Zeng, Y., Hao, D., Huete, A., Dechant, B., Berry, J., Chen, J. M., Joiner, J., Frankenberg, C., Bond-Lamberty, B., Ryu, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00298-5 · Cited by 837
Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress
Mohammed, G. H., Colombo, R., Middleton, E. M., Rascher, U., van der Tol, C., Nedbal, L., Goulas, Y., Pérez-Priego, O., Damm, A., Meroni, M., et al. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030 · Cited by 747
Hyperspectral remote sensing of plant pigments
Blackburn, G. A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl123 · Cited by 722
Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Miller, J. R., Noland, T. L., Mohammed, G. H., & Sampson, P. H. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.934080 · Cited by 722
Baluja, J., Diago, M. P., Balda, P., Zorer, R., Meggio, F., Morales, F., & Tardaguila, J. (2012) · Irrigation Science · doi:10.1007/s00271-012-0382-9 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- GAMON, J. A., & SURFUS, J. S.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-117
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2096996101
- Cited by
- 1,032
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00424.x
- The paper
- GAMON, J. A., & SURFUS, J. S. (1999). Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00424.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.