The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tansley Review No. 112: Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling
Open accessAbstract
The gradual but huge increase in atmospheric O 2 concentration that followed the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis is one consequence that marks this event as one of the most significant in the earth's history. The high redox potential of the O 2/water couple makes it an extremely powerful electron sink that enables energy to be transduced in respiration. In addition to the tetravalent interconversion of O 2 and water, there exist a plethora of reactions that involve the partial reduction of O 2 or photodynamic energy transfer to produce active oxygen species (AOS). All these redox reactions have become integrated during evolution into the aerobic photosynthetic cell. This review considers photosynthesis as a whole‐cell process, in which O 2 and AOS are involved in reactions at both photosystems, enzyme regulation in the chloroplast stroma, photorespiration, and mitochondrial electron transport in the light. In addition, oxidants and antioxidants are discussed as metabolic indicators of redox status, acting as sensors and signal molecules leading to acclimatory responses. Our aim throughout is to assess the insights gained from the application of mutagenesis and transformation techniques to studies of the role of O 2 and related redox components in the integrated regulation of photosynthesis. contents I. I ntroduction 360 II. P hotoinhibition and active oxygen 360 III. O xygen as an electron acceptor 362 IV. R edox regulation of photosynthetic metabolism 368 V. P hotorespiration 369 VI. R espiration 376 VII. P hotosynthesis and redox signal transduction 378 VIII. C onclusions 380 Acknowledgements 381 References 381
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poderoso, J. J., Carreras, M. C., Lisdero, C., Riobó, N., Schöpfer, F., & Boveris, A. (1996) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1006/abbi.1996.0146 · Cited by 726
Zhang, N., & Portis, A. R. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.16.9438 · Cited by 323
Igamberdiev, A. U., Bykova, N. V., & Gardeström, P. (1997) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00756-4 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2003) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00223.x · Cited by 1,316
Self-citationCovington, M. F., Maloof, J. N., Straume, M., Kay, S. A., & Harmer, S. L. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130 · Cited by 747
Atkin, O. K., Bruhn, D., Hurry, V. M., & Tjoelker, M. G. (2005) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp03176 · Cited by 490
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- FOYER, C. H., & NOCTOR, G.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-388
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2588987108
- Cited by
- 923
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tansley Review No. 112: Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00667.x
- The paper
- FOYER, C. H., & NOCTOR, G. (2000). Tansley Review No. 112: Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00667.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.