The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T‐RFLP analysis
Abstract
• Niche differentiation for different soil substrates has been proposed as a mechanism contributing to ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity. This hypothesis has been largely untestable because of a lack of techniques to study the in situ distribution of ectomycorrhizal hyphae. • We developed a technique involving soil DNA extraction, PCR and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for species identification to investigate the vertical distribution of fungal hyphae in four distinct layers of the forest floor (lower litter, F-layer, H-layer, and B-horizon) of a Pinus resinosa plantation. • Fungal communities differed markedly among the four layers. Cluster analysis suggested six different patterns of resource utilization: litter-layer specialists, litter-layer generalists, F-layer, H-layer, and B-horizon species, and multilayer generalists. Known ectomycorrhizal species were found in all six clusters. • This spatial partitioning observed among ectomycorrhizal fungi along a single, relatively simple substrate-resource gradient supports the niche differentiation hypothesis as an important mechanism contributing to ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tedersoo, L., May, T. W., & Smith, M. E. (2010) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x · Cited by 1,016
Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest
Lindahl, B. D., Ihrmark, K., Boberg, J., Trumbore, S. E., Högberg, P., Stenlid, J., & Finlay, R. D. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x · Cited by 965
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity
Wardle, D. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00931.x · Cited by 687
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickie, I. A., Xu, B., & Koide, R. T.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11-24
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-535
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1973439073
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T‐RFLP analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00535.x
- The paper
- Dickie, I. A., Xu, B., & Koide, R. T. (2002). Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T‐RFLP analysis. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00535.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.