The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perlecan Binds to the β‐Amyloid Proteins (Aβ) of Alzheimer's Disease, Accelerates Aβ Fibril Formation, and Maintains Aβ Fibril Stability
Abstract
Abstract: Perlecan is a specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan that accumulates in the fibrillar β‐amyloid (Aβ) deposits of Alzheimer's disease. Perlecan purified from the Engelbreth‐Holm‐Swarm tumor was used to define perlecan's interactions with Aβ and its effects on Aβ fibril formation. Using a solid‐phase binding immunoassay, freshly solubilized full‐length Aβ peptides bound immobilized perlecan at two sites, representing both high‐affinity [KD = ∼5.8 × 10−11M for Aβ (1–40); KD = ∼6.5 × 10−12M for Aβ (1–42)] and lower‐affinity [KD = 3.5 × 10−8M for Aβ (1–40); KD = 4.3 × 10−8M for Aβ (1–42)] interactions. An increase in the binding capacity of Aβ (1–40) to perlecan correlated with an increase in Aβ amyloid fibril formation during a 1‐week incubation period. The high‐capacity binding of Aβ (1–40) to perlecan was similarly observed using perlecan heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans and was completely abolished by heparin, but not by chondroitin‐4‐sulfate. Using a thioflavin T fluorometry assay, perlecan accelerated the rate of Aβ (1–40) amyloid fibril formation, causing a significant increase in Aβ fibril assembly over a 2‐week incubation period at 1 h (2.8‐fold increase), 1 day (3.6‐fold increase), and 3 days (2.8‐fold increase) in comparison with Aβ (1–40) alone. Perlecan also initially accelerated the formation of Aβ (1–42) fibrils within 1 h and maintained significantly higher levels of Aβ (1–42) thioflavin T fluorescence throughout a 2‐week experimental period in comparison with Aβ (1–42) alone, suggesting perlecan's ability to maintain amyloid fibril stability. Perlecan's effects on Aβ (1–40) fibril formation and maintenance of Aβ (1–42) fibril stability occurred in a dose‐dependent manner and was also mediated primarily by perlecan's glycosaminoglycan chains. Perlecan was the most effective enhancer and accelerator of Aβ fibril formation when compared directly with other amyloid plaque components, including apolipoprotein E, α 1‐antichymotrypsin, P component, C1q, and C3. This study, therefore, demonstrates that perlecan not only binds to the predominant isoforms of Aβ, but also accelerates Aβ fibril formation and stabilizes amyloid fibrils once formed, confirming pivotal roles for perlecan in the pathogenesis of Aβ amyloidosis in Alzheimer's disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heparan sulphate antagonizes the binding of Aβ to HSPG in vitro.
“Heparan sulphate was shown to bind to the amino acid 13–16 region (HHQK) of Aβ (Brunden et al., 1993) and to antagonize the binding of Aβ to HSPG in vitro (Castillo et al., 1997).”
From Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycan and the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 Constitute Major Pathways for Neuronal Amyloid-β Uptake (2011) · cites this paper as Castillo et al., 1997
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuropathology of Alzheimer's Disease
Perl, D. P. (2010) · Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.1002/msj.20157 · Cited by 825
Amyloid seeds formed by cellular uptake, concentration, and aggregation of the amyloid-beta peptide
Hu, X., Crick, S. L., Bu, G., Frieden, C., Pappu, R. V., & Lee, J.-M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911281106 · Cited by 426
New Insights on How Metals Disrupt Amyloid β-Aggregation and Their Effects on Amyloid-β Cytotoxicity
Yoshiike, Y., Tanemura, K., Murayama, O., Akagi, T., Murayama, M., Sato, S., Sun, X., Tanaka, N., & Takashima, A. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m010706200 · Cited by 244
Carare, R. O., Hawkes, C. A., Jeffrey, M., Kalaria, R. N., & Weller, R. O. (2013) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12042 · Cited by 207
Kanekiyo, T., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Liu, C.-C., Zhang, L., & Bu, G. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5491-10.2011 · Cited by 212
Snow, A. D., Cummings, J. A., & Lake, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.710683 · Cited by 84
Self-citationECM in brain aging and dementia
Morawski, M., Filippov, M., Tzinia, A., Tsilibary, E., & Vargova, L. (2014) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63486-3.00010-4 · Cited by 84
Malavaki, C. J., Theocharis, A. D., Lamari, F. N., Kanakis, I., Tsegenidis, T., Tzanakakis, G. N., & Karamanos, N. K. (2011) · Biomedical Chromatography · doi:10.1002/bmc.1536 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Castillo, G. M., Ngo, C., Cummings, J., Wight, T. N., & Snow, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2452-2465
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review