Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Behavioral and Neuropathologic Changes Induced by Central Injection of Carboxyl‐Terminal Fragment of β‐Amyloid Precursor Protein in Mice

Song, D.‐K., Won, M.‐H., Jung, J.‐S., Lee, J.‐C., Kang, T.‐C., Suh, H.‐W., Huh, S.‐O., Paek, S.‐H., Kim, Y.‐H., Kim, S.‐H., Suh, Y.‐H.·1998·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract: Expression of the carboxyl‐terminal fragment (CT) of the β‐amyloid precursor protein (APP) in transgenic animals has been linked with neurotoxicity. However, it remains to be clarified whether the neurotoxicity is caused by β‐amyloid proteins (Aβs) derived from CT or by CT itself. To study the in vivo neurotoxicity of CT, mice were given a single intracerebroventricular injection of a recombinant 105‐amino acid CT (CT105; 68.5–685 pmol, intracerebroventricularly), and changes in behavior and in brain histology were examined. Animals given CT105 (410 or 685 pmol, intracerebroventricularly) showed a dose‐dependent impairment in the passive avoidance performance, whereas boiled CT105 had no effect. CT105 (685 pmol, intracerebroventricularly) induced reactive gliosis in neocortex and hippocampus and neurodegeneration in neocortex. These results indicate that centrally administered CT105 induces behavioral impairment and neuropathologic changes, suggesting a direct toxic effect of CT105 per se.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71020875.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kammesheidt A., Boyce F. M., Spanoyannis A. F., Cummings B. J., Ortegon M., Cotman C., Vaught J. L., and Neve R. L. (1992) Deposition of beta/A4 immunoreactivity and neuronal pathol- ogy in transgenic mice expressing the carboxy-terminal frag- ment of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor in the brain. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10857-10861.
  2. Neve R. L., Kammesheidt A., and Hohmann C. F. (1992) Brain transplants of cells expressing the carboxyl-terminal fragment of the Alzheimer amyloid protein precursor cause specific neu- ropathology in vivo. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 3448- 3452.
  3. Selkoe D. 1., Podlisny M. B., Joachim C. L., Vickers E. A., Lee G., Fritz L. C., and Oltersdorf T. (1988) Beta-amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer disease occurs as 110-to 135-kilodalton membrane-associated proteins in neural and nonneural tissues. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 7341-7345.
  4. Tamaoka A., Kalaria R. N., Lieberburg I., and Selkoe D. J. (1992) Identification of a stable fragment of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor containing the beta-protein in brain microvessels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1345-1349.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Song, D. ‐., Won, M. ‐., Jung, J. ‐., Lee, J. ‐., Kang, T. ‐., Suh, H. ‐., Huh, S. ‐., Paek, S. ‐., Kim, Y. ‐., Kim, S. ‐., & Suh, Y. ‐.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-08
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
875-878
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
58
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review