Cited by 215Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

Cellular and Subcellular Localization of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptors After Trimethyltin Neurotoxicity

Kuhlmann, Anthony C., Guilarte, Tomás R.·2000·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) is currently used as a marker of inflammation and gliosis following brain injury. Previous reports suggest that elevated PBR levels in injured brain tissue are specific to activated microglia and infiltrating macrophages. We have produced hippocampal lesions using the neurotoxicant trimethyltin (TMT) to examine the cellular and subcellular nature of the PBR response. Degenerating, argyrophilic pyramidal neurons were observed in the hippocampus at 2 and 14 days after TMT exposure. Reactive microglia were also evident at both times with a maximal response observed at 14 days, subsiding by 6 weeks. Astrocytosis was observed at 14 days and 6 weeks, but not 2 days, after TMT administration, suggesting that the onset of the astroglia response is delayed, but more persistent, compared with microgliosis. Morphological evidence from [3H]PK11195 microautoradiography and PBR immunohistochemistry indicates that both astrocytes and microglia are capable of expressing high levels of PBR after injury. This was confirmed by double labeling of either Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4, a microglial-specific marker, or glial fibrillary acidic protein, an astrocyte-specific protein with PBR fluorescence immunohistochemistry. These results demonstrate that PBR expression is increased after brain injury in both activated microglia and astrocytes. Our findings also provide the first evidence for in situ nuclear localization of PBR in glial cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741694.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 215

Authors
Kuhlmann, A. C., & Guilarte, T. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
1694-1704
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1983702345
Cited by
215
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES03819, P30ES003819, ES-07062)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Keywords
translocator protein (TSPO), hippocampal lesions, microglial activation, astrocyte activation, gliosis, brain injury, nuclear localization, PK11195, neuroinflammation, subcellular localization
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Astrocytes, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hippocampus, Isoquinolines, Male, Nerve Degeneration, Neurotoxins, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, GABA-A, Trimethyltin Compounds, Tritium, Microglia, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review