Cited by 286Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsInflammasome and immune disordersTryptophan and brain disorders

Molecular consequences of activated microglia in the brain: overactivation induces apoptosis

Liu, Bin, Wang, Kevin, Gao, Hui-Ming, Mandavilli, Bhaskar, Wang, Jia-Yi, Hong, Jau-Shyong·2001·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Microglia, the resident immune cells in the brain, play a pivotal role in immune surveillance, host defense, and tissue repair in the CNS. In response to immunological challenges, microglia readily become activated as characterized by morphological changes, expression of surface antigens, and production of immune modulators that impact on neurons to induce neurodegeneration. However, little is known concerning the fate of activated microglia. In the present study, stimulation of cultured rat primary microglia with 1 ng/mL of the inflammagen lipopolysaccharide (LPS) resulted in a maximal activation as measured by the release of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). However, treatment with higher concentrations of LPS resulted in significantly lower quantities of detectable TNF alpha. Further analysis revealed that overactivation of microglia with higher concentrations of LPS (> 1 ng/mL) resulted in a time- and dose-dependent apoptotic death of microglia as defined by DNA strand breaks, surface expression of apoptosis-specific markers (phosphatidylserine), and activation of caspase-3. In contrast, astrocytes were insensitive to LPS-induced cytotoxicity. In light of the importance of microglia and the limited replenishment mechanism, depletion of microglia from the brain may severely hamper its capacity for combating inflammatory challenges and tissue repair. Furthermore, overactivation-induced apoptosis of microglia may be a fundamental self-regulatory mechanism devised to l…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.t01-1-00216.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 286

Authors
Liu, B., Wang, K., Gao, H.-M., Mandavilli, B., Wang, J.-Y., & Hong, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
182-189
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2014012364
Cited by
286
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
microglial activation, microglial apoptosis, lipopolysaccharide, TNF-α, caspase-3, microglial depletion, astrocytes, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glycoproteins, Lipopolysaccharides, Tetrazolium Salts, Thiazoles, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Apoptosis, Annexin A5, Microglia, Molecular Chaperones, Caspases, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Clusterin, Rats, Caspase 3, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review