Iron (III) induces aggregation of hyperphosphorylated τ and its reduction to iron (II) reverses the aggregation: implications in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
Abstract Iron as well as aluminum is reported to accumulate in neurons with neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. Previously we demonstrated that aluminum (III) shows phosphate‐dependent binding with hyperphosphorylated τ (PHFτ), the major constituent of NFTs, thereby inducing aggregation of PHFτ. Herein we report that iron (III) can also induce aggregation of soluble PHFτ. Importantly, for the aggregation of PHFτ to occur, iron in the oxidized state (III) is essential since iron in the reduced state (II) lacks such ability. Furthermore, iron (III)‐induced aggregation is reversed by reducing iron (III) to iron (II). Thus the iron‐participating aggregation is mediated not only by τ phosphorylation but also by the transition of iron between reduced (II) and oxidized (III) states. Further incubation of insoluble PHFτ aggregates isolated from AD brain with reducing agents produced liberation of solubilized PHFτ and iron (II), indicating that PHFτ in association with iron (III) constitutes the insoluble pool of PHFτ. These results indicate that iron might play a role in the aggregation of PHFτ leading to the formation of NFTs in AD brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The aggregation of proteins involved in neurodegenerative disorders, such as α synuclein and hyper-phosphorylated tau protein, has been shown in vitro to be triggered by elevated ferric iron concentrations.
“The aggregation of proteins involved in neurodegenerative disorders (eg, α synuclein70 and hyper-phosphorylated tau protein) have been shown in vitro to be triggered by elevated ferric iron concentrations.71”
From The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 313
- Authors
- Yamamoto, A., Shin, R., Hasegawa, K., Naiki, H., Sato, H., Yoshimasu, F., & Kitamoto, T.
- Affiliations
- Wakayama Medical University (JP)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- University of Fukui (JP)
- Japanese Red Cross Society, Japan (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Shin, Ryong‐Woon
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1137-1147
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W3174077129
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
- Keywords
- iron(III), tau protein, hyperphosphorylated tau, protein aggregation, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, iron(II) reduction, metal-induced aggregation, aluminum, tau phosphorylation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review