Cited by 313Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals

Iron (III) induces aggregation of hyperphosphorylated τ and its reduction to iron (II) reverses the aggregation: implications in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease

Abstract

Abstract Iron as well as aluminum is reported to accumulate in neurons with neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. Previously we demonstrated that aluminum (III) shows phosphate‐dependent binding with hyperphosphorylated τ (PHFτ), the major constituent of NFTs, thereby inducing aggregation of PHFτ. Herein we report that iron (III) can also induce aggregation of soluble PHFτ. Importantly, for the aggregation of PHFτ to occur, iron in the oxidized state (III) is essential since iron in the reduced state (II) lacks such ability. Furthermore, iron (III)‐induced aggregation is reversed by reducing iron (III) to iron (II). Thus the iron‐participating aggregation is mediated not only by τ phosphorylation but also by the transition of iron between reduced (II) and oxidized (III) states. Further incubation of insoluble PHFτ aggregates isolated from AD brain with reducing agents produced liberation of solubilized PHFτ and iron (II), indicating that PHFτ in association with iron (III) constitutes the insoluble pool of PHFτ. These results indicate that iron might play a role in the aggregation of PHFτ leading to the formation of NFTs in AD brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.t01-1-01061.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The aggregation of proteins involved in neurodegenerative disorders, such as α synuclein and hyper-phosphorylated tau protein, has been shown in vitro to be triggered by elevated ferric iron concentrations.

    “The aggregation of proteins involved in neurodegenerative disorders (eg, α synuclein70 and hyper-phosphorylated tau protein) have been shown in vitro to be triggered by elevated ferric iron concentrations.71”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 313

Authors
Yamamoto, A., Shin, R., Hasegawa, K., Naiki, H., Sato, H., Yoshimasu, F., & Kitamoto, T.
Affiliations
  • Wakayama Medical University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • University of Fukui (JP)
  • Japanese Red Cross Society, Japan (JP)
Corresponding author
Shin, Ryong‐Woon
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
1137-1147
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W3174077129
Cited by
313
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Keywords
iron(III), tau protein, hyperphosphorylated tau, protein aggregation, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, iron(II) reduction, metal-induced aggregation, aluminum, tau phosphorylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review