The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
proseq: A software for preparation and evolutionary analysis of DNA sequence data sets
Abstract
Summary: proseq is an integrated user‐friendly windows based program for convenient sequence editing and evolutionary analysis. It is designed to simplify preparation and analysis of DNA sequence data sets in population genetic, phylogenetic and molecular ecology studies. Sequence editor features include editing of chromatogram files, contig assembly, sequence alignment, translation and other utilities. Analysis features include calculation of genetic diversity, divergence, population subdivision and gene flow with permutation‐based significance testing and various tests of neutrality. A tool for coalescent simulations implements models with intragenic recombination, population subdivision and population growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
Fu, Y. X., & Li, W. H. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · Cited by 4,034
On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination
Watterson, G. A. (1975) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · Cited by 3,915
EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF DNA SEQUENCES IN FINITE POPULATIONS
Tajima, F. (1983) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/105.2.437 · Cited by 3,092
SKREDE, I., EIDESEN, P. B., PORTELA, R. P., & BROCHMANN, C. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02908.x · Cited by 2,746
Molecular evidence for glacial refugia of mountain plants in the European Alps
SCHÖNSWETTER, P., STEHLIK, I., HOLDEREGGER, R., & TRIBSCH, A. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02683.x · Cited by 2,067
Rozas, J., & Rozas, R. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174 · Cited by 1,968
Gene genealogies and the coalescent process.
Hudson, R. R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,838
Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data.
Hudson, R. R., Slatkin, M., & Maddison, W. P. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/132.2.583 · Cited by 1,753
Optimal alignments in linear space
Myers, E. W., & Miller, W. (1988) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.11 · Cited by 1,235
Cited by
Mesozoic origin of coleoid cephalopods and their abrupt shifts of diversification patterns
López-Córdova, D. A., Avaria-Llautureo, J., Ulloa, P. M., Braid, H. E., Revell, L. J., Fuchs, D., & Ibáñez, C. M. (2022) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107331 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Filatov, D. A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Notes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-24
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 621-624
- ISSN
- 1471-8278 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8286
- OpenAlex
- W2078055007
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: proseq: A software for preparation and evolutionary analysis of DNA sequence data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00313.x
- The paper
- Filatov, D. A. (2002). proseq: A software for preparation and evolutionary analysis of DNA sequence data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00313.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
