The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Reports of malformed amphibians and global amphibian declines have led to public concern, particularly because amphibians are thought to be indicator species of overall environmental health. The topic also draws scientific attention because there is no obvious, simple answer to the question of what is causing amphibian declines? Complex interactions of several anthropogenic factors are probably at work, and understanding amphibian declines may thus serve as a model for understanding species declines in general. While we have fewer answers than we would like, there are six leading hypotheses that we sort into two classes. For class I hypotheses, alien species, over‐exploitation and land use change, we have a good understanding of the ecological mechanisms underlying declines; these causes have affected amphibian populations negatively for more than a century. However, the question remains as to whether the magnitude of these negative effects increased in the 1980s, as scientists began to notice a global decline of amphibians. Further, remedies for these problems are not simple. For class II hypotheses, global change (including UV radiation and global climate change), contaminants and emerging infectious diseases we have a poor, but improving understanding of how each might cause declines. Class II factors involve complex and subtle mechanistic underpinnings, with probable interactions among multiple ecological and evolutionary variables. They may also interact with class I hypotheses. Suspected mechanisms associated with class II hypotheses are relatively recent, dating from at least the middle of the 20th century. Did these causes act independently or in concert with pre‐existing negative forces of class I hypotheses to increase the rate of amphibian declines to a level that drew global attention? We need more studies that connect the suspected mechanisms underlying both classes of hypotheses with quantitative changes in amphibian population sizes and species numbers. An important step forward in this task is clarifying the hypotheses and conditions under which the various causes operate alone or together.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological responses to recent climate change.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bairlein, F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416389a · Cited by 9,975
Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H.-J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.-P. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070656 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 1×
“…amphibian biodiversity in south-western Ontario across some 43 000 km 2 ; by comparison, between 1990 and 1997 an average of about 60 000 km 2 of humid tropical forest were converted to agricultural landscapes each year, and an average of about 23 000 km 2 were degraded (Achard et al ., 2002).”
BackgroundBarinaga, M. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4946.1033 · Cited by 301 · cited 1×
“A U.S. National Research Council Workshop in 1990 followed with the first systematic examination of amphibian population declines (Barinaga, 1990; Wake, 1991).”
MethodClimate and amphibian declines
Pounds, J. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35070683 · Cited by 196
Tests of Null Models for Amphibian Declines on a Tropical Mountain
Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., Savage, J. M., & Gorman, G. C. (1997) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95485.x · Cited by 192
Cited by
FROST, D. R., GRANT, T., FAIVOVICH, J., BAIN, R. H., HAAS, A., HADDAD, C. F. B., DE SÁ, R. O., CHANNING, A., WILKINSON, M., DONNELLAN, S. C., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History · doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:tatol]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,922
What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8 · Cited by 730
Mechanisms of disease‐induced extinction
De Castro, F., & Bolker, B. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00693.x · Cited by 676
Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation
McKENZIE, D., GEDALOF, Z., PETERSON, D. L., & MOTE, P. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00492.x · Cited by 666
Amphibian and reptile declines over 35 years at La Selva, Costa Rica
Whitfield, S. M., Bell, K. E., Philippi, T., Sasa, M., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G., Savage, J. M., & Donnelly, M. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611256104 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, J. P., & Storfer, A.
- Venue
- Diversity and Distributions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-98
- ISSN
- 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-9516
- 1472-4642
- OpenAlex
- W2127218107
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00012.x
- The paper
- Collins, J. P., & Storfer, A. (2003). Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Diversity and Distributions. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00012.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.