The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research
Open accessAbstract
This study compares four broadly available industry classification schemes in a variety of applications common to capital market research. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes have been available since 1939 but are being replaced by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. The Global Industry Classifications Standard (GICS)SM system, jointly developed by Standard & Poor's and Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is popular among financial practitioners, whereas the Fama and French [1997] algorithm is used primarily by academics. Our results show that GICS classifications are significantly better at explaining stock return comovements, as well as cross‐sectional variations in valuation multiples, forecasted and realized growth rates, research and development expenditures, and various key financial ratios. The GICS advantage is consistent from year to year and is most pronounced among large firms. The other three methods differ little from each other in most applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accounting Information, Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital
LAMBERT, R., LEUZ, C., & VERRECCHIA, R. E. (2007) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2007.00238.x · Cited by 2,586
Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation
Hoberg, G., & Phillips, G. (2016) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/688176 · Cited by 2,095
Testing Asymmetric-Information Asset Pricing Models
Kelly, B., & Ljungqvist, A. (2012) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr134 · Cited by 580
Valuation Approaches and Metrics: A Survey of the Theory and Evidence
Damodaran, A. (2007) · Foundations and Trends® in Finance · doi:10.1561/0500000013 · Cited by 326
Learning and the disappearing association between governance and returns
Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.10.004 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhojraj, S., Lee, C. M. C., & Oler, D. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 745-774
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W3124462827
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1475-679x.2003.00122.x
- The paper
- Bhojraj, S., Lee, C. M. C., & Oler, D. K. (2003). What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-679x.2003.00122.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
