The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Fish Assemblages for the Conservation of Streams and Rivers in West‐Central Mexico
Abstract
The rivers and streams of west‐central Mexico are becoming increasingly degraded and warrant expanded conservation efforts. We have developed an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblage characteristics to aid in the preservation of the biological integrity and biodiversity of these waters. Our version is an adaptation of previous versions of the index of biotic integrity, which have proven effective in environmental assessment and monitoring in the United States and elsewhere. It consists of 10 fish assemblage attributes, termed metrics, that are related to environmental quality, ecosystem integrity, and biodiversity in west‐central Mexican streams and rivers: number of native species, percentage of benthic species, number of water column species, number of sensitive species, percentage of tolerant species, percentage of exotic species, percentage of omnivores, percentage of native livebearing species, relative abundance, and percentage of diseased or deformed. Data on fish communities from 27 sites on streams and small rivers in the vicinity of the Sierra de Manantlán, southwestern Jalisco, and in the upper Río Duero basin, northern Michoacán, were used to develop expectations and scoring criteria for each metric. The index value for a site was the sum of the scores for the 10 metrics. Index values and associated ratings of biotic integrity for the 27 sites corresponded closely with independent ratings based on habitat and water quality. However, additional tests of the index with independent data and refinement of metrics and scoring criteria are clearly warranted. The index shows promise for identifying key watersheds for the protection of intact native biotic communities and individual endangered and threatened species and for the long‐term monitoring and evaluation of biodiversity and ecosystem integrity in the streams and rivers of west‐central Mexico. Our version could serve as a model for the development of similar indices for other regions and other types of aquatic ecosystems in Mesoamerica.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research on fish community structure, species richness and density in temperate and tropical regions shows equivocal results on the effects of deforestation.”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lyons et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“but few have addressed directly the impact of deforestation on fish faunas (e.g.Burcham, 1988;Lyons et al., 1995;Kamdem Toham & Teugels, 1999).”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lyons et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“The opposite conclusion was reached for Mexican (Lyons et al., 1995) and African streams (Kamdem Toham & Teugels, 1999).”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lyons et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“in Mexico, Lyons et al. (1995) found more individuals in deforested streams.”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lyons et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of deforestation on total fish abundance (Lenat & Crawford, 1994;Agostinho & Penczak, 1995;Lyons et al., 1995;Harding et al., 1998).”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lyons et al., 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams
Bojsen, B. H., & Barriga, R. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyons, J., Navarro‐Pérez, S., Cochran, P. A., Santana, E. C., & Guzmán‐Arroyo, M.
- Affiliations
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (US)
- Universidad de Guadalajara (MX)
- St. Norbert College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Navarro‐Pérez, Sonia
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569-584
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2056797636
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Keywords
- Index of Biotic Integrity, fish assemblages, water quality assessment, native species, benthic species, sensitive species, introduced species, Sierra de Manantlán, biodiversity monitoring, ecological integrity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review