The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Effects of Predation on Conservation of Endangered Prey
Abstract
In parts of the world such as the Pacific Islands, Australia, and New Zealand, introduced vertebrate predators have caused the demise of indigenous mammal and bird species. A number of releases for reestablishment of these mammal species in mainland Australia have failed because predators extirpated the new populations. The nature of the decline of both extant populations and reintroduced colonies provides information on the dynamics of predation. Predator‐prey theory suggests that the effects of predation are usually inversely dependent on density (depensatory) when the prey are not the primary food supply of exotic predators. Thus, such predators can cause extinction of endemic prey species. Three types of evidence can be deduced from the predator‐prey interactions that allow predictions for conservation: (1) whether per capita rates of change for prey increase or decrease with declining prey densities, (2) whether predation is depensatory or density‐dependent, and (3) the overall magnitude of predation. If this magnitude is too high for coexistence, then the degree of predator removal required can be predicted. If the magnitude of predation is sufficiently low, then the threshold density of prey that management must achieve to allow predator and prey to coexist can also be predicted. We analyzed published reports of both declining populations and reintroduced colonies of endangered marsupial populations in Australia. The observed predation curves conformed to the predictions of predator‐prey theory. Some, such as the black‐footed rock‐wallaby ( Petrogale lateralis ), were classic alternate prey and were vulnerable below a threshold population size. Others, such as the brush‐tailed bettong ( Bettongia penicillata ), have a refuge at low numbers and thus offer the best chance for reintroduction. Our predictions suggest a protocol for an experimental management program for the conservation of sensitive prey species: (1) determination of net rates of change of prey with declining population, (2) improvement of survivorship through habitat manipulation, (3) improvement of survivorship through predator removal, (4) determination of the threshold density above which reintroductions can succeed, and (5) manipulations to change interactions from Type II to Type III. The task in the future is to determine how to change the vulnerability of the prey so that they can have a refuge at low numbers. Predicción de los Efectos de la Depredación en la Conservación de una Presa en Peligro de Extinción En algunas partes del mundo como son las Islas del Pacífico, Australia y Nueva Zelandia, los veretebrados depredadores introducidos han ocasionado la desaparición de especies indígenas de mamíferos y aves. Un gran número de liberaciones para el restablecimiento de estas especies de mamíferos en tierras continentales de Australia han fracasado debido a que los depredadores han extirpado las poblaciones nuevas. La naturaleza de la declinación tanto de las poblaciones existentes como de las colonias reintroducidas provee información de las dinámicas de la depredación. La teoría sobre depredador‐presa sugiere que los efectos de la depredación son usualmente inversamente densodependientes (depensatorios) cuando las presas no son el alimento principal de los depredadores exóticos. Por lo tanto, estos depredadores pueden causar la extinción de especies de presas endémicas. Existen tres tipos de evidencia que pueden ser deducidas de las interacciones depredador‐presa y que permiten predicciones para la conservación: 1) que las tasas de cambio per cápita de presas incremente o disminuya con la declinación de las densidades de presas, 2) que la depredación sea depensatoria o densodependiente, y 3) la magnitude total de la depredación. Si la magnitud es muy alta para la coexistencia, entonces el grado de remoción del depredador requerido puede ser predecido. Si la magnitud de la depredación es suficientemente baja, entonces la densidad umbral de la presa que debe ser alcanzado mediante manejo y que permita al depredador y la presa coexistir tambien puede ser predecido. Analizamos reportes publicados tanto de declinaciones de poblaciones como de colonias reintroducidas de poblaciones de marsupiales en peligro de extinción en Australia. Las curvas de depredación observadas se conformaron a la teoría de depredador‐presa. Albunas (i.e. el ualaby, Petrogale lateralis ) fue una clasica presa alternativa y fue vulnerable por debajo del tamaño poblacional umbral. Otras (i.e. Bettongia penicillata ) tiene un refugio de números bajos y ofrece la mejor de las opciones para reintroducciones. Nuestras predicciones sugieren un protocolo para un programa de manejo experimental para la conservación de especies de presas sensitivas: 1) determinación de tasas netas de cambio de presa con población en declive, 2) mejora de la supervivencia mediante la manipualción del hábitat, 3) mejora en la supervivencia mediante remoción de depredadores, 4) determinaci
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holling, C. S. (1959) · The Canadian Entomologist · doi:10.4039/ent91293-5 · Cited by 3,624
Holling, C. S. (1965) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9745fv · Cited by 2,701
Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and Strategy
Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W., & Reed, C. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4917.477 · Cited by 1,912
The Natural Control of Animal Populations
Solomon, M. E. (1949) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/1578 · Cited by 1,545
Burbidge, A. A., & McKenzie, N. L. (1989) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(89)90009-8 · Cited by 776
Ungulate Population Models with Predation: A Case Study with the North American Moose
Messier, F. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939551 · Cited by 552
Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna
Serena, M. (1995) · Cited by 389
Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia—A review
Short, J., Bradshaw, S. D., Giles, J., Prince, R. I. T., & Wilson, G. R. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91047-v · Cited by 370
Patterns and causes of extinction and decline in Australian conilurine rodents
Smith, A. P., & Quin, D. G. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(96)00002-x · Cited by 346
Managing vertebrate pests: foxes.
Saunders, G., Coman, B., Kinnear, J. E., & Braysher, M. (1995) · Cited by 325
Cited by
Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T., & Grenfell, B. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3 · Cited by 1,548
Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline
DIDHAM, R., TYLIANAKIS, J., GEMMELL, N., RAND, T., & EWERS, R. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.001 · Cited by 930
Top Predators as Conservation Tools: Ecological Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy
Sergio, F., Caro, T., Brown, D., Clucas, B., Hunter, J., Ketchum, J., McHugh, K., & Hiraldo, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173545 · Cited by 670
THE HUMAN FOOTPRINT IN THE WEST: A LARGE‐SCALE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS
Leu, M., Hanser, S. E., & Knick, S. T. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-0480.1 · Cited by 334
Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study
Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., & Dickman, C. R. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00203.x · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinclair, A. R. E., Pech, R. P., Dickman, C. R., Hik, D., Mahon, P., & Newsome, A. E.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-575
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1996597784
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Effects of Predation on Conservation of Endangered Prey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97030.x
- The paper
- Sinclair, A. R. E., Pech, R. P., Dickman, C. R., Hik, D., Mahon, P., & Newsome, A. E. (1998). Predicting Effects of Predation on Conservation of Endangered Prey. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97030.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.