The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local Extinctions of Terrestrial Insectivorous Birds in a Fragmented Landscape near Manaus, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract: We examined the distributions of nine species of terrestrial insectivorous birds in 4‐ to 14‐year‐old rainforest fragments north of Manaus, Brazil. We surveyed 11 fragments of 1, 10, and 100 ha, 95 ha of secondary vegetation, and nine continuous forest plots (controls) of 1–100 ha. We augmented standard spot‐mapping with extensive playback surveys. The fragments had been sampled with mist nets before isolation, so our results could be compared with the pre‐isolation distribution. For the nine species, there were 55 cases of local extinction in the 11 fragments between about 1 year after isolation and the time of our surveys. This corresponds to 74% extinction of the local populations in fragments. These extinctions occurred despite the second‐growth connection of some fragments to continuous forest as little as 70 m away. Three apparent colonization events by species not detected before isolation also occurred, but these may also reflect inadequate sampling before isolation. Our comparison of fragments and similar‐sized control plots in continuous forest showed an area effect on species richness in both fragments and control plots, but fragments had fewer species than control plots of equal size. In a fragmented Amazonian landscape, the full suite of terrestrial insectivores would persist in the short term only in large fragments ( > 100 ha), although much larger areas are probably necessary for the long‐term persistence of their populations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in fragmented forests in Costa Rica and Brazil, insectivores suffered greater declines and local extinctions than other avian groups (102–104).”
From Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web (2018) · cites this paper as [103]
Citations
Cites
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
Relationship of Genetic Variation to Population Size in Wildlife
Frankham, R. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061500.x · Cited by 1,547
Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds
Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R., & Faaborg, J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5206.1987 · Cited by 1,442
Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity.
Margules, C. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1987) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404016 · Cited by 1,173
Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities
Vigle, G. O., Laurance, W. F., & Bierregaard, R. O. (1998) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1447825 · Cited by 948
Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments
Lovejoy, T. Ε., Bierregaard, R. O., Rylands, A. B., Malcolm, J. R., Quintela, C. E., Harper, L. H., Brown, K., Powell, A., Powell, G. V. N., Schubart, H. O. R., et al. (1986) · Cited by 833
Stark, A. C., & Sclater, W. L. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 800
The Biological Dynamics of Tropical Rainforest Fragments
Bierregaard, R. O., Lovejoy, T. Ε., Kapos, V., & Hutchings, R. W. (1992) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312085 · Cited by 761
Structure and Organization of an Amazonian Forest Bird Community
Terborgh, J., Robinson, S. K., Parker, T. A., Munn, C. A., & Pierpont, N. (1990) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1943045 · Cited by 691
Sugden, A. M. (1991) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90216-k · Cited by 625
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Askins R. A., 1990, Population declines in migratory birds in eastern North America., Current Ornithology, 7, 1
- Borges S. H., 1995, Comunidade de aves em dois tipos de vegetação secondária da Amazônia central
- Johnson R. R., 1981, Playback as a special avian censusing technique., Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 68
- Sick H., 1993, Birds in Brazil
- Sieving K. E., 1997, Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities, 156
- Sokal R. R., 1981, Biometry
- Stouffer P. C. and S. H. Borges. 2000. Conservation recommendations for understory birds in Amazonian forest fragments and secondary areas. In R. O. Bierregaard Jr. C. Gascon T. E. Lovejoy and A. A. dos Santos editors. Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press New Haven Connecticut. (In press)
- Stratford J. A., 1997, The effects of forest fragmentation on terrestrial insectivorous birds in central Amazonas, Brazil
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500052 · Cited by 4,773
Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G., & Sampaio, E. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x · Cited by 1,847
Self-citationThe fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation
Laurance, W. F., Camargo, J. L., Luizão, R. C. C., Laurance, S. G. W., Pimm, S. L., Bruna, E. M., Stouffer, P. C., Williamson, G. B., Benítez‐Malvido, J., Vasconcelos, H. L. D., et al. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.021 · Cited by 1,039
“…leaf bryophytes (Zartman, 2003), tree seedlings (Benítez-Malvido and Martinez-Ramos, 2003a), palms (Scariot, 1999), understory insec-tivorous birds (Stratford and Stouffer, 1999; Ferraz et al., 2007), primates (Gilbert and Setz, 2001; Boyle and Smith, 2010a), and larger herbivorous mammals (Timo,…”
Self-citationClimate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web
Lister, B. C., & Garcia, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722477115 · Cited by 730
Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments
Şekercioḡlu, Ç. H., Ehrlich, P. R., Daily, G. C., Aygen, D., Goehring, D., & Sandí, R. F. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.012616199 · Cited by 598
Metadata
- Authors
- Stratford, J. A., & Stouffer, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Stratford, Jeffrey A.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1416-1423
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2096430647
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- local extinction, forest fragmentation, Amazon rainforest, secondary forest, fragment size, species richness, colonization, playback surveys, Manaus, forest isolation, population persistence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
