The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease
Abstract
Abstract: Utilitarian arguments concerning the value of biodiversity often include the benefits of animals, plants, and microbes as sources of medicines and as laboratory models of disease. The concept that species diversity per se may influence risk of exposure to disease has not been well developed, however. We present a conceptual model of how high species richness and evenness in communities of terrestrial vertebrates may reduce risk of exposure to Lyme disease, a spirochetal ( Borrelia burgdorferi ) disease transmitted by ixodid tick vectors. Many ticks never become infected because some hosts are highly inefficient at transmitting spirochete infections to feeding ticks. In North America, the most competent reservoir host for the Lyme disease agent is the white‐footed mouse ( Peromyscus leucopus ), a species that is widespread and locally abundant. We suggest that increases in species diversity within host communities may dilute the power of white‐footed mice to infect ticks by causing more ticks to feed on inefficient disease reservoirs. High species diversity therefore is expected to result in lower prevalence of infection in ticks and consequently in lower risk of human exposure to Lyme disease. Analyses of states and multistate regions along the east coast of the United States demonstrated significant negative correlations between species richness of terrestrial small mammals (orders Rodentia, Insectivora, and Lagomorpha), a key group of hosts for ticks, and per capita numbers of reported Lyme disease cases, which supports our “ dilution effect ” hypothesis. We contrasted these findings to what might be expected when vectors acquire disease agents efficiently from many hosts, in which case infection prevalence of ticks may increase with increasing diversity hosts. A positive correlation between per capita Lyme disease cases and species richness of ground‐dwelling birds supported this hypothesis, which we call the “ rescue effect .” The reservoir competence of hosts within vertebrate communities and the degree of specialization by ticks on particular hosts will strongly influence the relationship between species diversity and the risk of exposure to the many vector‐borne diseases that plague humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unhealthy Landscapes: Policy Recommendations on Land Use Change and Infectious Disease Emergence
Patz, J. A., Daszak, P., Tabor, G. M., Aguirre, A. A., Pearl, M., Epstein, J., Wolfe, N. D., Kilpatrick, A. M., Foufopoulos, J., Molyneux, D., et al. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.6877 · Cited by 975
Biodiversity inhibits parasites: Broad evidence for the dilution effect
Civitello, D. J., Cohen, J., Fatima, H., Halstead, N. T., Liriano, J., McMahon, T. A., Ortega, C. N., Sauer, E. L., Sehgal, T., Young, S., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506279112 · Cited by 758
An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705797105 · Cited by 753
The effect of global change on mosquito-borne disease
Franklinos, L. H. V., Jones, K. E., Redding, D. W., & Abubakar, I. (2019) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30161-6 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 722-728
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2048957164
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x
- The paper
- Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000). Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.