The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity
Abstract
Abstract: Genetic diversity is one of the three forms of biodiversity recognized by the World Conservation Union ( IUCN ) as deserving conservation. The need to conserve genetic diversity within populations is based on two arguments: the necessity of genetic diversity for evolution to occur, and the expected relationship between heterozygosity and population fitness. Because loss of genetic diversity is related to inbreeding, and inbreeding reduces reproductive fitness, a correlation is expected between heterozygosity and population fitness. Long‐term effective population size, which determines rates of inbreeding, should also be correlated with fitness. However, other theoretical considerations and empirical observations suggest that the correlation between fitness and heterozygosity may be weak or nonexistent. We used all the data sets we could locate (34 ) to perform a meta‐analysis and resolve the issue. Data sets were included in the study, provided that fitness, or a component of fitness, was measured for three or more populations along with heterozygosity, heritability, and/or population size. The mean weighted correlation between measures of genetic diversity, at the population level, and population fitness was 0.4323. The correlation was highly significant and explained 19% of the variation in fitness. Our study strengthens concerns that the loss of heterozygosity has a deleterious effect on population fitness and supports the IUCN designation of genetic diversity as worthy of conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determinants of genetic diversity
Ellegren, H., & Galtier, N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.58 · Cited by 874
Lewin, W.-C., Arlinghaus, R., & Mehner, T. (2006) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641260600886455 · Cited by 668
Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations
O’Grady, J. J., Brook, B. W., Reed, D. H., Ballou, J. D., Tonkyn, D. W., & Frankham, R. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.016 · Cited by 498
Self-citationThe inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics
Teixeira, J. C., & Huber, C. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015096118 · Cited by 474
Rapid transgenerational acclimation of a tropical reef fish to climate change
Donelson, J. M., Munday, P. L., McCormick, M. I., & Pitcher, C. R. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1323 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, D. H., & Frankham, R.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 230-237
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2124532543
- Cited by
- 2,428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x
- The paper
- Reed, D. H., & Frankham, R. (2003). Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.