The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of Habitat Area and Landscape Context for Species Richness of Bees and Wasps in Fragmented Orchard Meadows
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: I investigated how habitat area, habitat connectivity, and landscape context affect the species richness and abundance of trap‐nesting bees, wasps, and their natural enemies. The research was done on 45 orchard meadows ranging in size from 0.08 to 5.8 ha and differing in habitat connectivity and the surrounding landscape matrix. Effects of the surrounding landscape matrix were restricted to circles with a radius of 250 m. Only the species richness of natural enemies increased with landscape diversity in the surrounding matrix. Population densities of bees increased with habitat connectivity. Total species richness and species richness of bees, eumenid wasps, and natural enemies significantly increased with habitat area. Significant species‐area relationships existed for insect groups but not for plants, thereby confirming the hypothesis that higher trophic levels are more affected by habitat fragmentation than lower trophic levels. The slope of species‐area relationships was steeper for mutualistic bees than for predatory wasps and natural enemies. In contrast to expectations, the rate of parasitism did not depend on habitat area but only on the local and regional abundance of hosts. My results suggest that the area and connectivity of habitat fragments is most important for the conservation of habitat specialists, whereas generalists may profit from a diverse surrounding landscape matrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parry, G. D. R., Johnson, M. S., Bell, R. M., Edwards, R. W., & Wathern, P. (1984) · Planning and Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3045-3_3 · Cited by 7,591
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
Andrén, H., & Andren, H. (1994) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545823 · Cited by 3,037
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Pattern and Process in Macroecology
(2000) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470999592 · Cited by 1,590
Minireview: Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art?
Gustafson, E. J. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900011 · Cited by 1,586
Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions
Tilman, D. G., & Kareiva, P. (1997) · Ecology · Cited by 1,556
The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes
Ricketts, T. H. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/320863 · Cited by 1,501
Post‐fire recovery of ant communities in Submediterranean Pinus nigra forests
Rodrigo, A., & Retana, J. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04272.x · Cited by 1,448
Cited by
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218
Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?
Ricketts, T. H., Regetz, J., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., Bogdanski, A., Gemmill‐Herren, B., Greenleaf, S. S., Klein, A. M., Mayfield, M. M., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationKennedy, C. M., Lonsdorf, E., Neel, M. C., Williams, N. M., Ricketts, T. H., Winfree, R., Bommarco, R., Brittain, C., Burley, A. L., Cariveau, D., et al. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12082 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationIndicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study
Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., et al. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x · Cited by 741
Forup, M. L., Henson, K. S. E., Craze, P. G., & Memmott, J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01390.x · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Steffan‐Dewenter, I.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-16
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1036-1044
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2162370043
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of Habitat Area and Landscape Context for Species Richness of Bees and Wasps in Fragmented Orchard Meadows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01575.x
- The paper
- Steffan‐Dewenter, I. (2003). Importance of Habitat Area and Landscape Context for Species Richness of Bees and Wasps in Fragmented Orchard Meadows. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01575.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.