Inclusion of Native and Alien Species in Temperate Nature Reserves: an Historical Study from Central Europe
Abstract
We studied the establishment and inclusion of native and alien plant species in nature reserves in the Czech Republic. Our aim was to answer the following questions: Do young and old nature reserves contain the same proportion of invasive plant species? Does the time of their introduction affect their representation in these reserves? We obtained recent lists of vascular plant species for 302 reserves established since 1838 and designated the species as native or alien. We divided the latter category into archaeophytes and neophytes, introduced before and after 1500, respectively. The increase in the number of reserves and species was evaluated by inclusion curves. For inclusion curves describing an increase in the number of reserves, the estimated time of 50% inclusion indicated when half the reserves of a particular type were established. For inclusion curves describing an increase in the number of species, the estimated time of 50% inclusion indicated when half the species of a particular category ( native species, all aliens, archaeophytes, neophytes ), reported from the country, were included in the nature reserves. The forest and dry‐grassland reserves were established earlier than those in wetlands and peat bogs, whereas humid‐grassland reserves tended to be the most recently established. Half the native species were included significantly earlier ( after 25 years ) than half of alien species ( 86 years ), and half the neophytes were included later ( 143 years ) than h…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protected area boundaries provide some resistance to colonization by alien plants.
“several studies have shown that protected area boundaries provide some resistance to colonization by alien plants (Lonsdale, 1999; Pyšek, Jarošík, & Kučera, 2003; Foxcroft et al., 2011).”
From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Pyšek, Jarošík, & Kučera, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L. C., Genovesi, P., et al. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12627 · Cited by 2,234 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., & Kučera, T.
- Affiliations
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ)
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Pyšek, Petr
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1414-1424
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2074214966
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- protected areas, non-native plants, invasive plants, archaeophytes, neophytes, native species, species pool, temperate flora, Czech Republic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review