Cited by 235Skin Protection and AgingDNA Repair MechanismsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The Similarity of Action Spectra for Thymine Dimers in Human Epidermis and Erythema Suggests that DNA is the Chromophore for Erythema

Open access
Young, Antony R., Harrison, Graham I., Chadwick, Caroline A., Nikaido, Osamu, Ramsden, Jonathan, Potten, Christopher S.·1998·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

The location of DNA photodamage within the epidermis is crucial as basal layer cells are the most likely to have carcinogenic potential. We have determined the action spectra for DNA photodamage in different human epidermal layers in situ. Previously unexposed buttock skin was irradiated with 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 minimal erythema doses of monochromatic UVR at 280, 290, 300, 310, 320, 340, and 360 nm. Punch biopsies were taken immediately after exposure and paraffin sections were prepared for immunoperoxidase staining with a monoclonal antibody against thymine dimers that were quantitated by image analysis. Dimers were measured at two basal layer regions, the mid and the upper living epidermis. The slopes of dose-response curves were used to generate four action spectra, all of which had maxima at 300 nm. Dimer action spectra between 300 and 360 nm were independent of epidermal layer, indicating comparable epidermal transmission at these wavelengths. Furthermore, we observed 300 nm-induced dimers in dermal nuclei; however, there was a marked effect of epidermal layer between 280 and 300 nm, showing relatively poor transmission of 280 and 290 nm to the basal layer. These data indicate that solar UVB (approximately 295-320 nm) is more damaging to basal cells than predicted from transmission data obtained from human epidermis ex vivo. The epidermal dimer action spectra were compared with erythema action spectra determined from the same volunteers and ultraviolet radiation sources. Overall, these spectral comparisons suggest that DNA is a major chromophore for erythema in the 280-340 nm region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00436.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UVR exposure causes direct damage to DNA, proteins or lipids, and indirect damage via reactive oxygen species (ROS).

    “The molecular effects of this exposure are well defined, causing either direct damage to DNA, proteins or lipids, such as in the formation of DNA photoproducts [1], and indirect damage via the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2, 3] that attack a range of molecular and cellular targets.”

    From Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids for Skin Photoprotection (2019) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 235

Authors
Young, A. R., Harrison, G. I., Chadwick, C. A., Nikaido, O., Ramsden, J., & Potten, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Young, Antony R.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
982-988
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986395084
Cited by
235
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
thymine dimers, DNA photodamage, action spectrum, erythema, human epidermis, basal layer, UV-B radiation, ultraviolet radiation, dose-response relationship, skin carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Chromogenic Compounds, DNA Damage, Epidermis, Erythema, Female, Humans, Male, Optical Rotatory Dispersion, Photochemistry, Pyrimidine Dimers, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review