Cited by 439Renin-Angiotensin System StudiesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema

Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: From ACEI to angiotensin II antagonists

Open access
Taal, Maarten W., Brenner, Barry M.·2000·Kidney International

Abstract

In landmark clinical trials, pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) attenuated the decline in renal function associated with chronic renal disease (CRD). Hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) attest to its central role in the pathogenesis of CRD. Angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists (AT1RA) differ from ACEI in their effects on the RAS and on bradykinin metabolism. Elevations in bradykinin levels associated with ACEI and stimulation of angiotensin subtype 2 receptors resulting from AT1RA may produce therapeutic effects unique to each class of drug. Nevertheless, in animal models of CRD, ACEI and AT1RA exert equivalent renoprotection, implying that their renoprotective effects result primarily from inhibition of Ang II-mediated stimulation of angiotensin subtype 1 receptors. Clinical data comparing ACEI and AT1RA therapy in renal disease are limited to short-term studies, which indicate that AT1RAs have equivalent effects to ACEI on the major determinants of CRD progression, namely blood pressure and proteinuria. AT1RAs were well tolerated, with side-effect profiles similar to placebo. Taken together, available evidence suggests that AT1RAs will share the renoprotective properties of ACEI in human CRD. Nevertheless, the results of long-term clinical trials are required before AT1RA can be recommended as an alternative to ACEI in renoprotective therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00031.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taal, M. W., & Brenner, B. M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
1803-1817
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028626467
Cited by
439
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Keywords
renal protection, renin-angiotensin system, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, bradykinin, chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, blood pressure, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Angiotensin II, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Animals, Chronic Disease, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Diseases, Proteinuria, Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 2, Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review