Cited by 539Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury ResearchRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies

The risk of developing end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: the RENAAL study

Open access
Keane, William F., Brenner, Barry M., de Zeeuw, Dick, Grunfeld, Jean-Pierre, McGill, Janet, Mitch, William E., Ribeiro, Artur B., Shahinfar, Shahnaz +4 more·2003·Kidney International

Abstract

Background Diabetic nephropathy has become the single most important cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Strategies to slow the rate of loss of renal function in these patients have been developed. We examined the risk factors that predict loss of kidney function (doubling of serum creatinine) or ESRD (dialysis or transplantation) in patients with type 2 diabetes in whom blood pressure was controlled. Methods We evaluated risk factors for doubling of serum creatinine or the development of ESRD in the Reduction of End Points in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, which included 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Results Univariate analyses demonstrated a group of 23 risk factors that significantly predicted doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD. From these univariate analyses, a multivariate model was developed that demonstrated four independent risk factors: proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, and hemoglobin level. Proteinuria was the strongest and most consistent risk factor. The multivariate risk model was derived from only the placebo group and was similar to that derived for the total population, suggesting that the risk predictors for progression of kidney disease were independent of therapy. Conclusion After control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy, proteinuria, degree of renal failure, serum albumin, and hemoglobin level are independent risk factors that predic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00885.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The kidney protective effect conferred by losartan exceeded the effect attributable to the small differences in blood pressure between the treatment groups.

    “The kidney protective effect conferred by losartan also exceeded the effect attributable to the small differences in blood pressure between the treatment groups.”
  • In the RENAAL trial, losartan significantly reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, and death, each by 16% compared with placebo, in combination with conventional antihypertensive treatment.

    “In the RENAAL trial, losartan signi fi cantly reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, and death, each by 16% compared with placebo, in combination with ' conventional ' antihypertensive treatment.”
  • Use of RAS blockade may be beneficial in patients with diabetes and CKD without hypertension.

    “suggesting that use of RAS blockade may be bene fi cial in patients without hypertension. 12,14”
  • RCTs demonstrated decreased risk of CKD progression with a maximally dosed RAS inhibitor compared with placebo or an active antihypertensive drug comparator in patients with albuminuria.

    “This recommendation is based on RCTs where findings demonstrated decreased risk of CKD progression, for which patients with albuminuria are at elevated risk, with a maximally dosed RAS inhibitor compared with placebo or an active antihypertensive drug comparator (42–44).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keane, W. F., Brenner, B. M., de Zeeuw, D., Grunfeld, J.-P., McGill, J., Mitch, W. E., Ribeiro, A. B., Shahinfar, S., Simpson, R. L., Snapinn, S. M., Toto, R., & RENAAL Study Investigators
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Keane, William F.
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
1499-1507
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059346848
Cited by
539
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 32
FWCI
21.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 02818-01A1, K24DK002818)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Keywords
end-stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, losartan, angiotensin receptor blockers, risk factors, proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, hemoglobin, blood pressure control
MeSH terms
Aged, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Proteinuria, Risk Factors, Serum Albumin, Multivariate Analysis, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review