Body Image and Quality of Life After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Abstract
objectives: The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of body image reintegration as it relates to quality of life in the surgical head and neck cancer patient. materials and methods: To illustrate the course of body image reintegration after head and neck cancer surgery, the results of two major studies are presented. In the first study, a cohort sample of 75 adults about to undergo disfigurative surgery for head and neck cancer was examined to determine levels of anxiety before and after the procedure. The State Trait Anxiety Inventory was administered before and after surgery on postoperative days 4 through 6. In the large study, from which the cohort sample was derived, 117 adults about to undergo disfigurative surgery were investigated to determine the relationship between coping with surgical disfigurement/dysfunction and length of hospital stay. The Ways of Coping Checklist was administered before surgery. Disfigurement/dysfunction, as measured by the Disfigurement/Dysfunction Scale, and postoperative coping behaviors, as measured by the Coping Behaviors Score, were accounted for in both samples. Self‐care and resocialization behaviors were observed and measured on postoperative days 4 through 6. results: In the cohort study, anticipation of disfigurative facial surgery was associated with extremely high levels of anxiety. In the large sample, coping effectiveness was diminished. The degree of surgical deficit ranged from mild to severe disfigurement and dysfunction. Preoperative coping effectiveness predicted postoperative coping behavior. It was concluded that body image reintegration was characterized by self‐care, resocialization, and reduced anxiety. Further, that these components, when taken together, constitute assimilation of the surgical defect into self. conclusions: Body image reintegration is critical to subsequent quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery. When disfigurement/dysfunction is associated with treatment, quality of life may be profoundly and adversely affected. Findings from the studies presented indicate a significant correlation between postoperative self‐care and reduction in level of anxiety. The implications of this finding are important to care during the early period after surgery and to long‐term follow‐up after hospital discharge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facial disfigurement can increase depression and reduce quality of life among head and neck cancer patients.
“For example facial disfigurement can increase depression and reduce quality of life (QoL) among head and neck cancer patients [4].”
Previous research supports the influence of preoperative expectations or anticipation of disfigurative head and neck cancer treatment on distress, anxiety, coping effectiveness, and post-operative satisfaction.
“Previous research supports the influence of preoperative expectations/anticipation of disfigurative HNC treatment on distress, anxiety, coping effectiveness, and post-operative satisfaction”
From Psychological variables associated with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of body image distress (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Preoperative expectations appear to be an important factor in psychosocial distress related to body image.
“One important variable to consider when examining psychosocial distress involving body image appears to be preoperative expectations.”
From Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [4]
In head and neck patients, anticipating disfiguring surgery and holding inaccurate views of postoperative appearance have been significantly linked to distress and poorer coping.
“The anticipation of disfigurative surgery as well as inaccurate perceptions of postoperative appearance in head and neck patients have been significantly related to overall distress and low levels of coping effectiveness.(3–5)”
From Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Dropkin, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dropkin, Mary jo
- Venue
- Cancer Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 309-313
- ISSN
- 1065-4704 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5394
- OpenAlex
- W2019751959
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01nr002239-03)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR02239A)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- head and neck cancer surgery, quality of life, postoperative anxiety, coping styles, self-care, resocialization, length of hospital stay, anticipatory anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Body Image, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review