Candida infections: outcome and attributable ICU costs in critically ill patients
Abstract
Candida species are an increasingly common cause of nosocomial infections. Candida infections have been associated with significant attributable morbidity and mortality, especially among critically ill patients. However, little is known about the cost implications of these increasingly common infections. In order to evaluate the costs associated with Candida infections in the critically ill, we report the findings of a 3-month prospective cohort study of Candida infections in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Infections were diagnosed according to prospectively established definitions. Cost data were extracted from the computerized billing database and used to estimate the ICU costs associated with nosocomial Candida infection. Using multiple linear regression, the effect of Candida infections on cost was adjusted for clinical variables in order to estimate the cost of ICU care attributable to Candida infection. Of 117 ICU patients enrolled in the study, 14 developed Candida infections. In a stepwise linear regression model adjusting for multiple clinical variables including APACHE II score, infection with Candida species was associated with an attributable ICU cost of $21,590. Over the cohort, the increased cost associated with Candida infections translates into a cost of $230/ICU patient-day. In addition, Candida infections were associated with an increased length of hospital stay of 17 days and an increased length of ICU stay of 8 days. In this small, prospective, cohort study, nosocomial Candida infections are independently associated with an increase in the cost of ICU care and an increased length of stay. No increase in mortality was noted, though it is possible a difference in mortality was missed due to the study's small sample size.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mortality attributable to candidemia, estimated by carefully matched retrospective cohort studies, ranges from 10% to 49%.
“Carefully matched, retrospective cohort studies have been undertaken to estimate mortality attributable to candidemia and report rates ranging from 10% to 49%.[10][11][12][13][14][15]”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [11]
The added hospital cost from candidemia is as much as $40,000 per case.
“Estimates from numerous studies suggest the added hospital cost is as much as $40,000 per case.[10][11][12][16][17][18][19][20]”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Pelz, R. K., Lipsett, P. A., Swoboda, S. M., Diener-West, M., Powe, N. R., Brower, R. G., Perl, T. M., Hammond, J. M., & Hendrix, C. W.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-09-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 255-261
- ISSN
- 0885-0666 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1489
- OpenAlex
- W2157046988
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Keywords
- candidiasis, nosocomial infections, intensive care unit costs, attributable costs, critically ill patients, length of hospital stay, APACHE II score, fungemia, medical intensive care unit, surgical intensive care unit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review