The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert
Abstract
Arbuscular‐mycorrhizal (AM) fungi stabilize the soil and enhance plant growth by alleviating nutrient and drought stress. Their contributions to agriculture are well known, but their role in desert ecosystems has received less attention. The AM status of perennial plants in disturbed and undisturbed plots were investigated in the Sonoran Desert near La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico to determine if AM fungi contribute to resource‐island stability and plant establishment. All perennial plants (46 species) in the study plots were AM, but root colonization varied widely (<10 to> 70%). Roots of plants that established in greatest numbers in plant‐free zones (colonizers) of disturbed areas were highly AM. Plants with trace (<10%) root colonization (cacti of the tribe Pachycereae: Pachycereus pringlei,Machaerocereus gummosus, and Lemaireocereus thurberi;and Agave datilyo) established preferentially in association with nurse trees. The pachycereid cacti grew under Prosopis articulata and A. datilyo under Olneya tesota canopies. Of the nine species of trees and arborescent shrubs in the area, the mature (>20 yr) nurse‐legumes P. articulata and O. tesota supported the largest number of under‐story plants. Younger plants had only occasional associates. AM propagule densities in plant‐free areas were lower than under plant canopies (40 vs. 280 propagules/kg soil). Occurrence of soil mounds (islands) under plants owing to soil deposition was related to the nature of the canopies and to the AM status of the roots. Island soils were enmeshed with AM‐fungal hyphae, especially in the upper layer (approximately 10 cm). Seedlings of P. pringlei, growing in a screenhouse for six months in soil collected under P. articulata, had a biomass ten times greater than plants growing in bare‐area soil. The results are consistent with the proposition that AM fungi contributed to the plant‐soil system of our study area by: (1) helping to stabilize windborne soil that settles under dense plant canopies; (2) enhancing the establishment of colonizer plants in bare soils of disturbed areas; and (3) influencing plant associations through differences in the mycotrophic status of the associates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation.
Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F. (1993) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312122 · Cited by 1,306
Cited by
Puente, M. E., Bashan, Y., Li, C. Y., & Lebsky, V. K. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-821100 · Cited by 278
Self-citationde-Bashan, L. E., Hernandez, J.-P., & Bashan, Y. (2012) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.09.003 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrillo‐Garcia, Á., De La Luz, J. ‐. L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay, G. J.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-335
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2020467984
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72027.x
- The paper
- Carrillo‐Garcia, Á., De La Luz, J. ‐. L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay, G. J. (1999). Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72027.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.