Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert

Carrillo‐Garcia, Á., De La Luz, J.‐L. León, Bashan, Y., Bethlenfalvay, G. J.·1999·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

Arbuscular‐mycorrhizal (AM) fungi stabilize the soil and enhance plant growth by alleviating nutrient and drought stress. Their contributions to agriculture are well known, but their role in desert ecosystems has received less attention. The AM status of perennial plants in disturbed and undisturbed plots were investigated in the Sonoran Desert near La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico to determine if AM fungi contribute to resource‐island stability and plant establishment. All perennial plants (46 species) in the study plots were AM, but root colonization varied widely (<10 to> 70%). Roots of plants that established in greatest numbers in plant‐free zones (colonizers) of disturbed areas were highly AM. Plants with trace (<10%) root colonization (cacti of the tribe Pachycereae: Pachycereus pringlei,Machaerocereus gummosus, and Lemaireocereus thurberi;and Agave datilyo) established preferentially in association with nurse trees. The pachycereid cacti grew under Prosopis articulata and A. datilyo under Olneya tesota canopies. Of the nine species of trees and arborescent shrubs in the area, the mature (>20 yr) nurse‐legumes P. articulata and O. tesota supported the largest number of under‐story plants. Younger plants had only occasional associates. AM propagule densities in plant‐free areas were lower than under plant canopies (40 vs. 280 propagules/kg soil). Occurrence of soil mounds (islands) under plants owing to soil deposition was related to the nature of the canopies and to the AM status of the roots. Island soils were enmeshed with AM‐fungal hyphae, especially in the upper layer (approximately 10 cm). Seedlings of P. pringlei, growing in a screenhouse for six months in soil collected under P. articulata, had a biomass ten times greater than plants growing in bare‐area soil. The results are consistent with the proposition that AM fungi contributed to the plant‐soil system of our study area by: (1) helping to stabilize windborne soil that settles under dense plant canopies; (2) enhancing the establishment of colonizer plants in bare soils of disturbed areas; and (3) influencing plant associations through differences in the mycotrophic status of the associates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72027.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Carrillo‐Garcia, Á., De La Luz, J. ‐. L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay, G. J.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
321-335
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2020467984
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72027.x
The paper
Carrillo‐Garcia, Á., De La Luz, J. ‐. L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay, G. J. (1999). Nurse Plants, Mycorrhizae, and Plant Establishment in a Disturbed Area of the Sonoran Desert. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1999.72027.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.